• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

有志者事竟成。

Where there's a will.

作者信息

Schroeder L O

机构信息

Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge.

出版信息

Med Law. 1992;11(5-6):417-22.

PMID:1484464
Abstract

Since the United States Supreme Court decision in the Cruzan case, there will be more use of living wills which authorize the discontinuance of medical treatment for the terminally ill. Nutrition and hydration have been included as medical treatment in some cases. The statutes which authorize these documents provide that they can be revoked. Medical personnel who may be in close contact with patients and their families, such as nurses and social workers, should be trained in the provisions of living wills and what can amount to their revocation.

摘要

自美国最高法院对克鲁赞案作出裁决以来,将会更多地使用授权停止对绝症患者进行治疗的生前遗嘱。在某些情况下,营养和水合作用已被纳入医疗范畴。授权这些文件的法规规定它们可以被撤销。可能与患者及其家属密切接触的医务人员,如护士和社会工作者,应接受有关生前遗嘱条款及其撤销情形的培训。

相似文献

1
Where there's a will.有志者事竟成。
Med Law. 1992;11(5-6):417-22.
2
In re Ray.关于雷案
Issues Law Med. 1993 Summer;9(1):69-70.
3
The prognosis for changes in end-of-life care after the Schiavo case.施亚沃案后临终关怀变化的预后情况。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2005 Jul-Aug;24(4):972-5. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.24.4.972.
4
After the Cruzan case: uniform legislation available to help preserve rights of the terminally ill.克鲁赞案之后:有统一的立法来帮助维护绝症患者的权利。
Hawaii Med J. 1990 Oct;49(10):375.
5
Living will statutes in light of Cruzan v. Director, Missouri Dept. of Health: ensuring that patient's wishes will prevail.依据克鲁赞诉密苏里州卫生部主任案看生前遗嘱法规:确保患者意愿得以实现。
Emory Law J. 1991 Fall;40(4):1305-41.
6
Reconciling Quinlan and Saikewicz: decision making for the terminally ill incompetent.调和昆兰与赛克维茨案:为临终无行为能力者做决策
Am J Law Med. 1979 Winter;4(4):367-96.
7
Can complex legislation solve our end-of-life problems?复杂的立法能解决我们的临终问题吗?
Camb Q Healthc Ethics. 1994 Winter;3(1):115-24. doi: 10.1017/s0963180100004795.
8
Cruzan and its sequelae: the Supreme Court decides its first "right-to-die" case.
J Clin Ethics. 1990 Fall;1(3):242-4.
9
In re Michael Martin.关于迈克尔·马丁案
Issues Law Med. 1994 Winter;10(3):355-9.
10
Decisions to abate life-sustaining treatment for nonautonomous patients. Ethical standards and legal liability for physicians after Cruzan.关于放弃对无自主能力患者的维持生命治疗的决策。克鲁赞案后医生的道德标准与法律责任。
JAMA. 1990 Oct 10;264(14):1846-53.