Walzer R S
Reiss, Walzer & Starks, Norwalk, Connecticut.
Med Law. 1992;11(5-6):423-40.
It is apparent from a growing body of court decisions that physician-patient confidentiality has been limited in those circumstances where society has a need to know certain specific information. The treating physician's duty to breach confidentiality and to warn third parties of a patient's dangerousness because of violent intent, effects of medication or dangerous health condition encompasses a duty to report previously undisclosed impairment of a fellow physician who is in treatment. The alternative is to convince the impaired colleague to withdraw from practice until the impairment is remedied. Thus, a physician collegially providing care of a colleague shoulders a particular responsibility when the physician patient is found to manifest professional impairment. This article presents a development of this thesis based upon common law and legislation in the United States.
越来越多的法院判决表明,在社会需要了解某些特定信息的情况下,医患保密权受到了限制。主治医生有责任违反保密规定,并因患者的暴力意图、药物作用或危险健康状况而向第三方警告患者的危险性,这其中包括报告之前未披露的正在接受治疗的同行医生的损害情况。另一种选择是说服受损的同事退出执业,直到损害得到纠正。因此,当发现医生患者表现出职业损害时,共同为同事提供护理的医生肩负着特殊的责任。本文基于美国的普通法和立法对这一论点进行了阐述。