Ferrinho P, Valli A, Groeneveld T, Buch E, Coetzee D
Centre for Epidemiological Research in Southern Africa, South African Medical Research Council.
Cent Afr J Med. 1992 Aug;38(8):324-30.
Cluster sampling was popularised by the sampling procedure promoted by the WHO/UNICEF for the evaluation of the expanded programme of immunisation (EPI). Without a clear understanding of the limitations of the sampling strategy used, this sampling strategy has been extended to other types of surveys. This article shows how to approach the assessment of cluster sampling techniques scientifically by calculating design effects (DEFFs) and rates of homogeneity (roh) and illustrates this scientific assessment with three case studies from Alexandra in South Africa. We report on the DEFFs and rohs for variables studied in these surveys. The DEFF for all the variables relating to housing tended to exceed two and was as high as 6.99 for the variable new development. The variables relating to health service utilisation and health practices, namely immunisation status, nutrition status, presence of Road to Health Cards (RTDCs), breast-feeding and knowledge of diarrhoea and oral rehydration all had a DEFF close to one. The variables relating to contraception use, literacy and schooling had DEFFs close to one and a half. For a few variables the DEFFs were below one and the rates of homogeneity less than zero. The highest values of roh were for environment factors (all above 0.1433). Rohs for factors related to utilization of PHC services were mostly between 0.0200 and 0.0499. No single class of factors seemed to be related to very low values of roh. These results are then discussed.
整群抽样因世界卫生组织/联合国儿童基金会为评估扩大免疫规划(EPI)所推行的抽样程序而得到普及。由于对所采用抽样策略的局限性缺乏清晰认识,这种抽样策略已被扩展到其他类型的调查中。本文展示了如何通过计算设计效应(DEFFs)和同质性率(roh)来科学地评估整群抽样技术,并通过南非亚历山德拉的三个案例研究来说明这种科学评估。我们报告了这些调查中所研究变量的DEFFs和rohs。所有与住房相关变量的DEFF往往超过2,新开发变量的DEFF高达6.99。与卫生服务利用和健康实践相关的变量,即免疫状况、营养状况、是否持有健康之路卡(RTDCs)、母乳喂养以及腹泻和口服补液知识,其DEFF均接近1。与避孕使用、识字率和受教育程度相关的变量,其DEFF接近1.5。对于一些变量,DEFF低于1,同质性率小于零。roh的最高值出现在环境因素中(均高于0.1433)。与初级卫生保健服务利用相关因素的rohs大多在0.0200至0.0499之间。似乎没有单一类别的因素与非常低的roh值相关。然后对这些结果进行了讨论。