Suppr超能文献

评估用于估计相对风险的EPI调查方法。

Evaluation of the EPI survey methodology for estimating relative risk.

作者信息

Harris D R, Lemeshow S

机构信息

University of Massachusetts, Amherst.

出版信息

World Health Stat Q. 1991;44(3):107-14.

PMID:1949878
Abstract

Precision in estimation of relative risks using a standardized sampling method proposed by the WHO Global Programme on AIDS was evaluated using a Monte Carlo model simulating actual populations; the proposed survey design represents a modification of the methodology used by the WHO Expanded Programme on Immunization (EPI) to estimate immunization coverage among children. This study suggests that in actual populations the proposed survey strategy is a reasonable alternative to the use of simple random sampling (SRS) at the second stage of cluster sampling. Although varying such population characteristics as the seroprevalence rate, nonresponse rate, and rate of misclassification of exposure failed to demonstrate a clear advantage of one method over the other, the added cost and difficulty of implementing SRS under field conditions warrant further consideration of the EPI-like methodology for use in estimating relative risks.

摘要

利用世界卫生组织全球艾滋病规划署提议的标准化抽样方法来精确估计相对风险,采用了模拟实际人群的蒙特卡洛模型进行评估;提议的调查设计是对世界卫生组织扩大免疫规划(EPI)用于估计儿童免疫覆盖率的方法的一种改进。本研究表明,在实际人群中,提议的调查策略是在整群抽样第二阶段使用简单随机抽样(SRS)的合理替代方法。尽管改变诸如血清阳性率、无应答率和暴露误分类率等人群特征未能显示出一种方法相对于另一种方法有明显优势,但在实地条件下实施SRS的额外成本和难度值得进一步考虑采用类似EPI的方法来估计相对风险。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验