Hara Anderson T, Queiroz Celso S, Giannini Marcelo, Cury Jaime A, Serra Mônica C
Department of Restorative Dentistry, University of Campinas (UNICAMP), Brazil.
Eur J Oral Sci. 2004 Feb;112(1):67-72. doi: 10.1111/j.0909-8836.2004.00093.x.
Dentine substrates with different mineral contents and morphological patterns were created by submitting root slabs to the following treatments: (A) immersion in artificial saliva during the experimental period (control), (B) demineralization for 32 h to induce caries lesion (demineralized group), and (C) demineralization for 32 h followed by remineralization for 8 d (remineralized group). The slabs were longitudinally sectioned, the mineral content was determined by cross-sectional microhardness, and the bond strength of an adhesive system/composite resin was assessed using a microtensile bond strength test. The dentine morphology after the treatments as well as the failure pattern of the debonded specimens was examined by scanning electron microscopy. Statistically significant differences were found in mineral content. Morphological analysis showed marked differences between the patterns of demineralized and remineralized substrates. The bond strength mean value of the control A did not differ from the group B, but was statistically higher than the group C. Since no linear relationship was found between dentine mineral content and bond strength values, it could be suggested that the morphological pattern may be more relevant than the mineral content to explain the bond strength of composite resin to dentine.
通过对牙根切片进行以下处理,制备出具有不同矿物质含量和形态模式的牙本质基质:(A) 在实验期间浸泡于人工唾液中(对照组),(B) 脱矿32小时以诱导龋损(脱矿组),以及(C) 脱矿32小时后再矿化8天(再矿化组)。将切片纵向切割,通过横截面显微硬度测定矿物质含量,并使用微拉伸粘结强度测试评估粘结系统/复合树脂的粘结强度。通过扫描电子显微镜检查处理后的牙本质形态以及脱粘标本的失效模式。发现矿物质含量存在统计学上的显著差异。形态学分析表明,脱矿和再矿化基质的模式之间存在明显差异。对照组A的粘结强度平均值与B组无差异,但在统计学上高于C组。由于未发现牙本质矿物质含量与粘结强度值之间存在线性关系,因此可以认为形态模式可能比矿物质含量更能解释复合树脂与牙本质之间的粘结强度。