Poumarat G, Squire P, Lawani M
Laboratory of Biomechanics and Instrumentation, Blaise Pascal University, Clermont-Ferrand, France.
J Sports Med Phys Fitness. 1992 Sep;32(3):227-33.
Previous studies have considered the effects of the superimposition of electrical stimulation (ES) upon maximal voluntary contraction (MVC) under isometric conditions. This investigation considered these effects using isokinetic muscle action. Eleven males, non athletes, volunteered for the experiment. Isokinetic torque for extension of the right knee was measured by means of a Cybex 340 using two speeds of movement, 12 degrees/s and 30 degrees/s. Torque was measured at 5 degrees increments (from 100 degrees flexion to full extension) under conditions of MVC alone and MVC+ES. Stimulation was provided by means of a bi-phasic, symmetrical, square wave with a pulse width of 600 mu. Frequency of stimulation was either 30 Hz or 80 Hz. It was found that the pattern of torque production was unaffected by the application of ES. Peak torque values at both speeds were significantly lower when ES was applied at both frequencies compared to MVC alone. This inhibitory effect was found to extend throughout the middle range of movement. This tended to be more pronounced with the 80 Hz frequency. In general these findings were in agreement with those reported previously for isometric conditions. Possible explanations for these results include the inability of ES to recruit more motor units than MVC alone; the limitations of the subjects to tolerate a current of a sufficiently high intensity to elicit a stronger contraction, possibly due to lack of familiarization with these forms of muscle action; and the characteristics, especially pulse width, of the stimulating current.
以往的研究探讨了等长条件下电刺激(ES)叠加于最大自主收缩(MVC)时的效应。本研究采用等速肌肉运动来考察这些效应。11名非运动员男性志愿者参与了该实验。使用Cybex 340以12度/秒和30度/秒两种运动速度测量右膝伸展的等速扭矩。在仅MVC和MVC + ES的条件下,以5度增量(从100度屈曲到完全伸展)测量扭矩。通过双相、对称、方波进行刺激,脉冲宽度为600微秒。刺激频率为30赫兹或80赫兹。结果发现,扭矩产生模式不受ES施加的影响。与仅MVC相比,在两种频率下施加ES时,两个速度下的峰值扭矩值均显著降低。这种抑制作用在整个运动的中间范围内都存在。80赫兹频率时这种情况往往更明显。总体而言,这些发现与先前报道的等长条件下的结果一致。这些结果的可能解释包括:与仅MVC相比,ES无法募集更多运动单位;受试者可能由于对这些肌肉运动形式不熟悉,而难以耐受足够高强度的电流以引发更强的收缩;以及刺激电流的特性,尤其是脉冲宽度。