Sederer L I, Eisen S V, Dill D, Grob M C, Gougeon M L, Mirin S M
McLean Hospital, Belmont, MA 02178.
Hosp Community Psychiatry. 1992 Nov;43(11):1120-6. doi: 10.1176/ps.43.11.1120.
A fixed-prepayment system (case-based reimbursement) for patients initially requiring hospital-level care was evaluated for one year through an arrangement between a private nonprofit psychiatric hospital and a self-insured company desiring to provide psychiatric services to its employees. This clinical and financial experiment offered a means of containing costs while monitoring quality of care. A two-group, case-control study was undertaken of treatment outcomes at discharge, patient satisfaction with hospital care, and service use and costs during the program's first year. Compared with costs for patients in the control group, costs for those in the program were lower per patient and per admission; cumulative costs for patients requiring rehospitalization were also lower. However, costs for outpatient services for patients in the program were not calculated. Treatment outcomes and patients' satisfaction with hospital care were comparable for the two groups.
一家私立非营利性精神病医院与一家希望为其员工提供精神科服务的自保公司达成协议,对最初需要医院级护理的患者采用固定预付款系统(按病例报销)进行了为期一年的评估。这项临床和财务试验提供了一种在监测护理质量的同时控制成本的方法。针对出院时的治疗结果、患者对医院护理的满意度以及该项目第一年的服务使用情况和成本,进行了一项两组病例对照研究。与对照组患者的成本相比,该项目患者的人均成本和每次住院成本更低;需要再次住院的患者的累计成本也更低。然而,该项目患者的门诊服务成本未计算在内。两组的治疗结果和患者对医院护理的满意度相当。