Mital A, McGlothlin J D, Faard H F
Ergonomics and Engineering Controls Research Laboratory, University of Cincinnati, Ohio 45221-0116.
J Hum Ergol (Tokyo). 1992 Jun;21(1):69-82.
Computers in the workplace have become very prevalent. As with the introduction of any new technology, unanticipated problems often develop. Noise in open-plan computer rooms and annoyance and perceived deterioration in performance associated with it also appears to be a problem that may be similarly categorized. An experimental investigation was undertaken as a result of frequent user complaints about the difficulty of concentrating and performing their work in the computer rooms of a large service organization. Two typical computer rooms were investigated. Noise levels were measured at random times during the working hours. The noise spectrum was found to be almost similar in both facilities. The 10-second A-weighted noise level for all frequencies ranged between 53 and 62 dB. Most noise energy was either in the high-frequency bands (above 2,000 Hz) or low-frequency bands (below 500 Hz). The highest noise energy levels were recorded at 8,000 Hz (between 64 and 73 dB). Least noise energy levels were recorded between 500 and 2,000 Hz (between 35 and 44 dB). The noise spectrum, thus, was substantially different from those of open-plan offices. Eighty-nine percent of the users questioned indicated their tasks required concentration. Fifty percent of all respondents rated the noise level between extremely annoying and unbearable and intolerable (scale values between 22 and 25 on a 25-point scale; 1 being noticeable but not objectionable and 25 being unbearable and intolerable); 10% of the respondents considered the noise very annoying; 20% of the respondents considered the noise levels moderately annoying; the remaining respondents did not seem to have a major problem. Conversational sound and computer-printer beeping sounds were reported to be most annoying by 90% of the respondents who considered the noise levels annoying. Constant arrival and departure of users, sound from keyboards, and ventilation equipment also appeared to be major contributing factors.
计算机在工作场所已变得非常普遍。与任何新技术的引入一样,往往会出现意想不到的问题。开放式计算机房的噪音以及与之相关的烦恼和工作表现的明显下降似乎也是一个可进行类似分类的问题。由于大型服务机构的计算机房用户频繁抱怨难以集中精力工作,因此开展了一项实验性调查。对两个典型的计算机房进行了调查。在工作时间随机测量噪音水平。发现两个设施中的噪音频谱几乎相似。所有频率的10秒A加权噪音水平在53至62分贝之间。大部分噪音能量要么在高频段(高于2000赫兹),要么在低频段(低于500赫兹)。最高噪音能量水平记录在8000赫兹(64至73分贝之间)。最低噪音能量水平记录在500至2000赫兹之间(35至44分贝之间)。因此,该噪音频谱与开放式办公室的噪音频谱有很大不同。89%接受询问的用户表示他们的任务需要集中精力。所有受访者中有50%将噪音水平评为极其烦人、无法忍受(在25分制中评分为22至25分;1分表示可察觉但不令人反感,25分表示无法忍受);10%的受访者认为噪音非常烦人;20%的受访者认为噪音水平适度烦人;其余受访者似乎没有什么大问题。90%认为噪音水平烦人的受访者表示,对话声和计算机打印机的哔哔声最烦人。用户的不断进出、键盘声音和通风设备的声音似乎也是主要的影响因素。