Pawłaczyk-Luszczyńska Małgorzata, Dudarewicz Adam, Waszkowska Małgorzata, Sliwińska-Kowalska Mariola
Department of Physical Hazards, Nofer Institute of Occupational Medicine, Lódź, Poland.
Int J Occup Med Environ Health. 2003;16(4):337-43.
It has been shown that low frequency noise (LFN), defined as broadband noise with dominant content of low frequencies (10-250 Hz), may be annoying to exposed subjects. The aim of the study was to compare the degree of annoyance caused by LFN with that caused by broadband noise (BBN) without dominant low frequency components at similar A-weighted sound pressure levels.
Subjects included in the study were 145 male employees of the control rooms. They were exposed to noise through headphones at gradually increasing dB A-weighted sound pressure levels within the range of 62-84 dB. Annoyance rating was based on a 100-score graphical scale.
LFN was rated as significantly more annoying than BBN at the comparable A-weighted sound pressure levels. The annoyance assessment of either noise did not depend on age, length of employment or the level of exposure to noise at a current workplace.
LFN represents a higher risk of influencing human well-being than regular BBN and should be considered in the occupational exposure assessment.
研究表明,低频噪声(LFN),即主要包含低频成分(10 - 250赫兹)的宽带噪声,可能会使暴露于其中的人感到烦恼。本研究的目的是在相似的A加权声压级下,比较低频噪声与无主要低频成分的宽带噪声(BBN)所引起的烦恼程度。
本研究的受试者为145名控制室男性员工。他们通过耳机在62 - 84分贝范围内逐渐增加的A加权声压级下暴露于噪声中。烦恼评级基于100分的图形量表。
在可比的A加权声压级下,低频噪声的烦恼程度被评定为显著高于宽带噪声。两种噪声的烦恼评估均不取决于年龄、工作年限或当前工作场所的噪声暴露水平。
与普通宽带噪声相比,低频噪声对人类福祉的影响风险更高,在职业暴露评估中应予以考虑。