Isaka Y, Iiji O, Imaizumi M, Ashida K, Itoi Y
Department of Diagnostic Radiology, National Osaka Hospital.
Kaku Igaku. 1992 Dec;29(12):1463-73.
We converted an absolute value of 133Xe-CBF (initial slope index, ISI) to the three dimensional CBF-SPECT using the intravenous 133Xe injection technique and 99mTc-HMPAO SPECT according to the microsphere model (method A), and the three compartment model described by Lassen et al. (method B): [formula: see text] [formula: see text] where f = flow in the region of interest (ROI), fr = flow in the reference region, C = count density of 99mTc-HMPAO SPECT in the ROI, Cr = count density of 99mTc-HMPAO SPECT in the reference region, and alpha = conversion to clearance ratio of HMPAO. We used alpha value of 1.5, and the whole cerebrum as a reference region. Four asymptomatic subjects and 15 patients with ischemic cerebrovascular disease were entered the study. In method A, excellent correlation was seen between ISI and SPECT-CBF in both of the cerebral hemisphere (r = 0.993; p < 0.001, n = 38) and the cerebellar hemisphere (r = 0.901; p < 0.001, n = 38). When back diffusion of HMPAO was corrected by method B, correlation coefficient of SPECT-CBF with ISI was equivalent to that in method A in the cerebrum (r = 0.978; p < 0.001, n = 38), while the correlation coefficient ih the cerebellum was lowered (r = 0.726; p < 0.001, n = 38) although high flow to low flow ratio was increased. Reproducibility of rCBF assessed 1 week apart from the first CBF-SPECT was highly reproducible in all of the brain regions; correlation coefficient ranged from 0.757 to 0.910 with a mean correlation coefficient of 0.834 (n = 11). The slope and intercept of the linear regression line between 2nd rCBF versus 1st CBF were 0.889 (range, 0.791-1.141) and 5.5 (range, -9.1-13.4), respectively. Regional CBF measured by method B was approximately 20% increase from that measured by method A. However, there was no significant difference in the reproducibility of rCBF between the two methods. Our results indicate that rCBF can be simply and noninvasively quantified using 99mTc-HMPAO SPECT and absolute unit of CBF measured by 133Xe injection technique. SPECT-CBF offers high resolution images and may be applicable for various cerebrovascular disorders in routine clinical use.
我们根据微球模型(方法A)以及Lassen等人描述的三室模型(方法B),采用静脉注射¹³³Xe技术和⁹⁹ᵐTc-HMPAO SPECT,将¹³³Xe-CBF的绝对值(初始斜率指数,ISI)转换为三维CBF-SPECT:[公式:见原文][公式:见原文]其中f =感兴趣区域(ROI)的血流量,fr =参考区域的血流量,C = ROI中⁹⁹ᵐTc-HMPAO SPECT的计数密度,Cr =参考区域中⁹⁹ᵐTc-HMPAO SPECT的计数密度,α =转换为HMPAO的清除率。我们使用α值为1.5,并将整个大脑作为参考区域。4名无症状受试者和15名缺血性脑血管疾病患者进入本研究。在方法A中,大脑半球(r = 0.993;p < 0.001,n = 38)和小脑半球(r = 0.901;p < 0.001,n = 38)的ISI与SPECT-CBF之间均显示出极好的相关性。当用方法B校正HMPAO的反向扩散时,大脑中SPECT-CBF与ISI的相关系数与方法A相当(r = 0.978;p < 0.001,n = 38),而小脑中的相关系数降低(r = 0.726;p < 0.001,n = 38),尽管高流量与低流量之比增加。在首次CBF-SPECT检查1周后评估的rCBF的可重复性在所有脑区都具有高度可重复性;相关系数范围为0.757至0.910,平均相关系数为0.834(n = 11)。第二次rCBF与第一次CBF之间线性回归线的斜率和截距分别为0.889(范围为0.791 - 1.141)和5.5(范围为 - 9.1 - 13.4)。通过方法B测量的区域CBF比通过方法A测量的区域CBF大约增加20%。然而,两种方法在rCBF的可重复性方面没有显著差异。我们的结果表明,使用⁹⁹ᵐTc-HMPAO SPECT和通过¹³³Xe注射技术测量的CBF绝对单位,可以简单且无创地对rCBF进行量化。SPECT-CBF提供高分辨率图像,可能适用于常规临床使用中的各种脑血管疾病。