Aderibigbe Y A, Gureje O
Department of Psychiatry, University College Hospital, Ibadan, Nigeria.
Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 1992 Nov;27(6):280-3. doi: 10.1007/BF00788899.
The 28-item General Health Questionnaire (GHQ-28) was validated against the Psychiatric Assessment Schedule (PAS) using data collected during a prospective study of psychiatric disorders associated with childbirth among 277 Nigerian women attending an antenatal clinic. Using the results of correlational analyses of the total scores on the GHQ and on the PAS and the traditional validity coefficients of sensitivity, specificity, and misclassification rate, the instrument was shown to be a valid tool for the detection of psychiatric morbidity in this population. With a sensitivity of 82% and a specificity of 85%, the revised scoring method devised by Goodchild and Duncan-Jones performed better in discriminating 'cases' from 'non-cases' than the conventional scoring method, which values respectively, of 75% and 83%. In a discriminant function analysis, only three of the four subscales of the instrument contributed to its discriminating power.
在一项针对277名到产前诊所就诊的尼日利亚妇女进行的、与分娩相关的精神障碍前瞻性研究中,使用收集到的数据,对包含28个条目的一般健康问卷(GHQ - 28)与精神科评估量表(PAS)进行了效度验证。通过对GHQ和PAS总分的相关分析结果以及传统的效度系数(敏感性、特异性和错误分类率),该工具被证明是检测该人群精神疾病的有效工具。Goodchild和Duncan - Jones设计的修订评分方法敏感性为82%,特异性为85%,在区分“病例”和“非病例”方面比传统评分方法表现更好,传统评分方法的敏感性和特异性分别为75%和83%。在判别函数分析中,该工具四个子量表中只有三个对其判别能力有贡献。