Goodchild M E, Duncan-Jones P
Br J Psychiatry. 1985 Jan;146:55-61. doi: 10.1192/bjp.146.1.55.
We propose a new scoring for Goldberg's (1972) General Health Questionnaire. We argue that the response 'no more than usual', to an item describing pathology, should be treated as an indicator of chronic illness rather than of good health, and we score these responses accordingly. We give evidence that this set of responses is associated with other measures of neurotic illness, and that the revised scoring provides a better prediction of caseness than the conventional scoring. The revised scoring is more strongly associated with trait neuroticism, and is more stable in repeated measurement. It is recommended in preference to the conventional scoring for most research and epidemiological purposes.
我们针对戈德堡(1972年)的一般健康问卷提出了一种新的评分方法。我们认为,对于描述病症的一项内容,回答“不超过平常”应被视为慢性病的指标,而非健康良好的指标,我们据此对这些回答进行评分。我们给出证据表明,这组回答与神经症性疾病的其他测量指标相关,且修订后的评分比传统评分能更好地预测病例情况。修订后的评分与特质神经质的关联更强,在重复测量中更稳定。对于大多数研究和流行病学目的,建议优先使用修订后的评分而非传统评分。