Airan M C, Ko S T
Rush Presbyterian St. Luke's Medical Center, Chicago, IL.
Am J Med Qual. 1992 Fall;7(3):85-7. doi: 10.1177/0885713x9200700305.
With the advent of laparoscopic cholecystectomy, assessment of data and its relationship to quality of care became important. The Mount Sinai Hospital Medical Center conducted a prospective survey in conjunction with the Society of American Gastrointestinal Endoscopic Surgeons (SAGES) National Survey. In this survey, only two surgeons operated as surgeon and co-surgeon with an extremely small rate of complication. A national survey of chairpersons in surgery was designed at Rush Presbyterian St. Luke's Hospital, and 4300 chairpersons were mailed questionnaires to record complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. There were 36,232 patients and 3111 surgeons in the survey. The Southern Surgeons Club experience, as reported in New England Journal of Medicine, was reviewed. Because of the complexity of understanding the implications of the survey results, the authors have arrived at a simplified system of evaluating quality of care in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. In this system only three considerations are taken into account: (a) elective conversions to standard operation, (b) forced conversions (due to iatrogenic injuries), and (c) reoperation rate (delayed complication). It is hoped that data collection will be simplified and more meaningful.
随着腹腔镜胆囊切除术的出现,对数据及其与医疗质量关系的评估变得重要起来。西奈山医院医疗中心与美国胃肠内镜外科医师协会(SAGES)全国调查联合开展了一项前瞻性调查。在这项调查中,只有两位外科医生作为主刀医生和助手进行手术,并发症发生率极低。拉什长老会圣卢克医院设计了一项针对外科主任的全国性调查,并向4300位主任邮寄了问卷,以记录腹腔镜胆囊切除术的并发症情况。该调查中有36232名患者和3111名外科医生。对发表在《新英格兰医学杂志》上的南方外科医生俱乐部的经验进行了回顾。由于理解调查结果的影响较为复杂,作者们得出了一个评估腹腔镜胆囊切除术医疗质量的简化系统。在这个系统中,只考虑三个因素:(a)选择性转为标准手术,(b)被迫转为标准手术(由于医源性损伤),以及(c)再次手术率(延迟并发症)。希望数据收集能够得到简化且更具意义。