Chopra R, Fielding A, Goldstone A H
Department of Haematology, University College Hospital, London, U.K.
Leuk Lymphoma. 1992;7 Suppl:73-7. doi: 10.3109/10428199209061570.
The use of high-dose chemotherapy and the subsequent prolonged neutropenia in patients with haematological diseases has resulted in an increased incidence of fungal infections. The only drug with proven efficacy in the treatment of deep seated fungal infections or invasive aspergillosis is amphotericin B. Unfortunately, this drug has adverse side effects, most importantly dose dependent nephrotoxicity. Furthermore, some patients fail to show a response to amphotericin B. We have treated 40 patients undergoing myeloablative chemotherapy and or bone marrow transplantation for haematological diseases with liposomal amphotericin for proven or suspected fungal infections. All patients had failed treatment with conventional Amphotericin B. Fourteen patients received liposomal amphotericin (AmBisome) due to progression of infection on conventional amphotericin B. Twenty six patients received liposomal amphotericin due to nephrotoxicity caused by conventional Amphotericin B. Nine patients had mycologically proven fungal infection and of these, 7 patients (78%) showed a complete response to liposomal amphotericin. Thirty one patients received liposomal amphotericin due to suspected fungal infection. Eleven of these 31 patients (35%) showed a complete clinical response to liposomal amphotericin. However in the patients with suspected fungal infections 14 patients had no response and 6 patients could not be evaluated for response to liposomal amphotericin. Overall, of the 18 patients showing a response to liposomal amphotericin, 15 patients had either recovered their neutrophil count (> 0.5 x 10(9)/l) or achieved remission from their underlying haematological disease. Recovery from fungal infection in this group of patients occurred when there was complete remission of underlying disease and recovery of neutrophil counts, when concurrently treated by liposomal amphotericin.
血液系统疾病患者使用大剂量化疗及随后出现的长期中性粒细胞减少导致真菌感染发生率增加。治疗深部真菌感染或侵袭性曲霉病唯一经证实有效的药物是两性霉素B。不幸的是,该药有不良副作用,最重要的是剂量依赖性肾毒性。此外,一些患者对两性霉素B无反应。我们用脂质体两性霉素治疗了40例因血液系统疾病接受清髓性化疗和/或骨髓移植且有已证实或疑似真菌感染的患者。所有患者接受传统两性霉素B治疗均失败。14例患者因传统两性霉素B治疗时感染进展而接受脂质体两性霉素(安必素)治疗。26例患者因传统两性霉素B引起的肾毒性而接受脂质体两性霉素治疗。9例患者真菌学证实有真菌感染,其中7例(78%)对脂质体两性霉素完全缓解。31例患者因疑似真菌感染接受脂质体两性霉素治疗。这31例患者中有11例(35%)对脂质体两性霉素有完全临床缓解。然而,在疑似真菌感染的患者中,14例无反应,6例无法评估对脂质体两性霉素的反应。总体而言,在对脂质体两性霉素有反应的18例患者中,15例中性粒细胞计数恢复(>0.5×10⁹/L)或潜在血液系统疾病缓解。当同时接受脂质体两性霉素治疗时,这组患者在潜在疾病完全缓解且中性粒细胞计数恢复时真菌感染得以痊愈。