Diderichsen F, Janlert U
Karolinska Institute, Department of Social Medicine, Sundbyberg, Sweden.
J Epidemiol Community Health. 1992 Dec;46(6):605-7. doi: 10.1136/jech.46.6.605.
The aim was to investigate the health effects of economic changes in a rural and industrial community.
This was a historical cohort study with retrospective information on exposure and information on health outcome from a mailed questionnaire (response rate 82.5%).
An industrial and a rural community in northern Sweden.
Participants included all men born in a rural community and a random sample of men born in a neighbouring industrial community 1915-1924 and alive in 1984 (N = 1989).
Morbidity was higher in the cohort born in the rural municipality in which more profound changes in the socioeconomic structure had occurred. Even when taking such factors as childhood deprivation, migration, socioeconomic status, early retirement, unemployment, and single living into consideration, most of the differences in morbidity in the two municipalities still remained. However, the changes in employment conditions alone do not appear to explain the differences in morbidity that were found.
The higher morbidity in the rural community indicates a health effect of the profound economic changes in that community but this difference cannot be explained by crude indicators of exposure to migration, unemployment, and other indicators of economic change.
旨在调查一个农村和工业社区经济变化对健康的影响。
这是一项历史性队列研究,通过邮寄问卷获取暴露的回顾性信息和健康结局信息(回复率82.5%)。
瑞典北部的一个工业社区和一个农村社区。
参与者包括所有出生于农村社区的男性,以及1915年至1924年出生于邻近工业社区且在1984年仍在世的男性随机样本(N = 1989)。
出生于社会经济结构发生更深刻变化的农村自治市的队列发病率更高。即使考虑到童年贫困、迁移、社会经济地位、提前退休、失业和单身生活等因素,两个自治市发病率的大部分差异仍然存在。然而,仅就业条件的变化似乎无法解释所发现的发病率差异。
农村社区较高的发病率表明该社区深刻经济变化对健康有影响,但这种差异无法用迁移暴露、失业和其他经济变化指标的粗略指标来解释。