Gorny Miroslaw K, Revesz Kathy, Williams Constance, Volsky Barbara, Louder Mark K, Anyangwe Christopher A, Krachmarov Chavdar, Kayman Samuel C, Pinter Abraham, Nadas Arthur, Nyambi Phillipe N, Mascola John R, Zolla-Pazner Susan
Department of Pathology, New York University School of Medicine, New York, New York 10016, USA.
J Virol. 2004 Mar;78(5):2394-404. doi: 10.1128/jvi.78.5.2394-2404.2004.
Antibodies (Abs) against the V3 loop of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 gp120 envelope glycoprotein were initially considered to mediate only type-specific neutralization of T-cell-line-adapted viruses. However, recent data show that cross-neutralizing V3 Abs also exist, and primary isolates can be efficiently neutralized with anti-V3 monoclonal Abs (MAbs). The neutralizing activities of anti-V3 polyclonal Abs and MAbs may, however, be limited due to antigenic variations of the V3 region, a lack of V3 exposure on the surface of intact virions, or Ab specificity. For clarification of this issue, a panel of 32 human anti-V3 MAbs were screened for neutralization of an SF162-pseudotyped virus in a luciferase assay. MAbs selected with a V3 fusion protein whose V3 region mimics the conformation of the native virus were significantly more potent than MAbs selected with V3 peptides. Seven MAbs were further tested for neutralizing activity against 13 clade B viruses in a single-round peripheral blood mononuclear cell assay. While there was a spectrum of virus sensitivities to the anti-V3 MAbs observed, 12 of the 13 viruses were neutralized by one or more of the anti-V3 MAbs. MAb binding to intact virions correlated significantly with binding to solubilized gp120s and with the potency of neutralization. These results demonstrate that the V3 loop is accessible on the native virus envelope, that the strength of binding of anti-V3 Abs correlates with the potency of neutralization, that V3 epitopes may be shared rather than type specific, and that Abs against the V3 loop, particularly those targeting conformational epitopes, can mediate the neutralization of primary isolates.
最初认为,针对人类免疫缺陷病毒1型(HIV-1)gp120包膜糖蛋白V3环的抗体(Abs)仅介导对T细胞系适应病毒的型特异性中和作用。然而,最近的数据表明,也存在交叉中和性V3抗体,并且原代分离株可用抗V3单克隆抗体(MAbs)有效中和。但是,由于V3区域的抗原变异、完整病毒粒子表面缺乏V3暴露或抗体特异性,抗V3多克隆抗体和单克隆抗体的中和活性可能受到限制。为了阐明这个问题,在荧光素酶测定中筛选了一组32种人抗V3单克隆抗体,以检测其对SF162假型病毒的中和作用。用V3区域模拟天然病毒构象的V3融合蛋白筛选出的单克隆抗体,其效力明显高于用V3肽筛选出的单克隆抗体。在单轮外周血单核细胞测定中,进一步测试了7种单克隆抗体对13种B亚型病毒的中和活性。虽然观察到这些病毒对抗V3单克隆抗体的敏感性存在差异,但13种病毒中的12种被一种或多种抗V3单克隆抗体中和。单克隆抗体与完整病毒粒子的结合与与可溶性gp120的结合以及中和效力显著相关。这些结果表明,V3环在天然病毒包膜上是可及的,抗V3抗体的结合强度与中和效力相关,V3表位可能具有共享性而非型特异性,并且针对V3环的抗体,特别是那些靶向构象表位的抗体,可以介导对原代分离株的中和作用。