Stamatatos L, Zolla-Pazner S, Gorny M K, Cheng-Mayer C
Aaron Diamond AIDS Research Center, Rockefeller University, New York, New York 10021-6399, USA.
Virology. 1997 Mar 17;229(2):360-9. doi: 10.1006/viro.1997.8443.
Using immunobiochemical approaches we previously studied the conformation and surface exposure of different immunodominant regions within the oligomeric, virion-associated form of the gp120 envelope glycoprotein of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) (L Stamatatos and C. Cheng-Mayer (1995) J. Virol. 69, 6191-6198). These studies allowed us to determine to what extent epitopes within these immunodominant regions of the oligomeric gp120 are occluded or accessible to antibody binding on the virion surface of two primary-like (HIV-1SF162 and HIV-1SF128A) and one. T-cell-line-adapted (HIV-1SF2) isolates. Here, we investigate whether binding of anti-gp120 monoclonal antibodies (MAbs) to exposed epitopes of the immunodominant regions of oligomeric gp120 results in neutralization of HIV-1 infection and whether certain exposed sites are better targets for neutralization than others. We also test whether proposed mechanisms for antibody-mediated neutralization of T-cell-line-adapted HIV-1 isolates, e.g., antibody-mediated gp120-virion dissociation, are applicable to primary-like HIV-1 isolates. We assess the neutralization potential of anti-V2 loop, anti-V3 loop, and anti-CD4 binding site MAbs using human primary macrophages or peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) as target cells and HIV-1SF162 and HIV-1SF128A as infecting isolates. Our data indicate that: (i) not every exposed epitope of the immunodominant regions of gp120 oligomers on the virion surface is a target for neutralization; (ii) during virus-cell fusion specific exposure of previously occluded V3 loop epitopes within gp120 oligomers occurs, which may become targets for neutralization; (iii) antibody-mediated gp120-virion dissociation does not appear to be a major mechanism of neutralization for the primary-like HIV-1 isolates tested here; and (iv) infection of macrophages is more sensitive to neutralization by anti-gp120 monoclonal antibodies than PBMC. We also report that binding of one of the two anti-CD4 binding site MAbs tested mediated enhancement of macrophage cell infection in a concentration-dependent fashion, while binding of the other anti-CD4 binding site MAb resulted in efficient neutralization of infection of both macrophages and PBMC.
我们之前运用免疫生化方法研究了人免疫缺陷病毒1型(HIV-1)的gp120包膜糖蛋白寡聚体、病毒体相关形式中不同免疫显性区域的构象和表面暴露情况(L·斯塔马塔托斯和C·程-迈耶,《病毒学杂志》,1995年,第69卷,第6191 - 6198页)。这些研究使我们能够确定寡聚体gp120这些免疫显性区域内的表位在两种原代样(HIV-1SF162和HIV-1SF128A)以及一种T细胞系适应型(HIV-1SF2)病毒株的病毒体表面上被抗体结合时被封闭或可及的程度。在此,我们研究抗gp120单克隆抗体(MAb)与寡聚体gp120免疫显性区域暴露表位的结合是否会导致HIV-1感染的中和,以及某些暴露位点是否比其他位点更适合作为中和靶点。我们还测试了针对T细胞系适应型HIV-1病毒株的抗体介导中和的拟议机制,例如抗体介导的gp120 - 病毒体解离,是否适用于原代样HIV-1病毒株。我们以人原代巨噬细胞或外周血单核细胞(PBMC)作为靶细胞,以HIV-1SF162和HIV-1SF128A作为感染病毒株,评估抗V2环、抗V3环和抗CD4结合位点单克隆抗体的中和潜力。我们的数据表明:(i)病毒体表面gp120寡聚体免疫显性区域的每个暴露表位并非都是中和靶点;(ii)在病毒 - 细胞融合过程中,gp120寡聚体内先前被封闭的V3环表位会发生特异性暴露,这可能成为中和靶点;(iii)抗体介导的gp120 - 病毒体解离似乎不是此处所测试的原代样HIV-1病毒株中和的主要机制;(iv)巨噬细胞感染对抗gp120单克隆抗体的中和作用比PBMC更敏感。我们还报告称,所测试的两种抗CD4结合位点单克隆抗体之一的结合以浓度依赖方式介导了巨噬细胞感染的增强,而另一种抗CD4结合位点单克隆抗体的结合则导致巨噬细胞和PBMC感染的有效中和。