Dousset S, Babut M, Andreux F, Schiavon M
UMR GéoSol-Microbiologie des Sols INRA A111, Université de Bourgogne, Centre des Sciences de la Terre, 6, boulevard Gabriel, 21 000 Dijon, France.
J Environ Qual. 2004 Jan-Feb;33(1):294-301. doi: 10.2134/jeq2004.2940.
Atrazine (6-chloro-N2-ethyl-N4-isopropyl-1,3,5-triazine-2,4-diamine) is frequently detected at high concentrations in ground water. Bentazone [3-isopropyl-1H-2,1,3-benzothiadiazin-4(3H)-one 2,2-dioxide] plus alachlor (2-chloro-2',6'-diethyl-N-methoxymethylacetanilide) is a potential herbicide combination used as a substitute for atrazine. Thus, the objective of this study was to assess the environmental risk of this blend. Drainage water contamination by bentazone and alachlor was assessed in silty clay (Vertic Eutrochrept) and silt loam (Aquic Hapludalf) soils under the same management and climatic conditions. Drainage volumes and concentrations of alachlor and bentazone were monitored after application. Herbicides first arrived at the drains after less than 1 cm of net drainage. This is consistent with preferential flow and suggests that about 3% of the pore volume was active in rapid transport. During the monitoring periods, bentazone losses were higher (0.11-2.40% of the applied amount) than alachlor losses (0.00-0.28%) in the drains of the silty clay and silt loam. The rank order of herbicide mass losses corresponded with the rank order of herbicide adsorption coefficients. More herbicide residues were detected in drainage from the silty clay, probably due to preferential flow and more intensive drainage in this soil than the silt loam. Surprisingly, herbicide losses were higher in the drains of both soils in the drier of the two study years. This could be explained by the time intervals between the treatments and first drainage events, which were longer in the wetter year. Results suggest that the drainage phases occurred by preferential flow in the spring-summer period, with correspondingly fast leaching of herbicides, and by matrix flow during the fall-winter period, with slower herbicide migration.
莠去津(6-氯-N2-乙基-N4-异丙基-1,3,5-三嗪-2,4-二胺)在地下水中经常被检测到高浓度存在。灭草松[3-异丙基-1H-2,1,3-苯并噻二嗪-4(3H)-酮2,2-二氧化物]加甲草胺(2-氯-2',6'-二乙基-N-甲氧基甲基乙酰苯胺)是一种用作莠去津替代品的潜在除草剂组合。因此,本研究的目的是评估这种混合物的环境风险。在相同管理和气候条件下,对粉质粘土(变性潮湿雏形土)和粉砂壤土(潮湿弱发育湿润淋溶土)土壤中灭草松和甲草胺造成的排水水污染进行了评估。施药后监测排水量以及甲草胺和灭草松的浓度。除草剂在净排水量不到1厘米后首先到达排水口。这与优先流一致,表明约3%的孔隙体积在快速运输中起作用。在监测期间,粉质粘土和粉砂壤土排水口中灭草松的损失(占施用量的0.11 - 2.40%)高于甲草胺的损失(0.00 - 0.28%)。除草剂质量损失的排序与除草剂吸附系数的排序一致。在粉质粘土的排水中检测到更多的除草剂残留,这可能是由于该土壤中优先流以及排水比粉砂壤土更强烈。令人惊讶的是,在两个研究年份中较干燥的年份,两种土壤排水口中的除草剂损失都更高。这可以通过处理与首次排水事件之间的时间间隔来解释,在较湿润的年份间隔更长。结果表明,排水阶段在春夏季节通过优先流发生,除草剂相应快速淋溶,而在秋冬季节通过基质流发生,除草剂迁移较慢。