Somasundar Ponnandai S, Mucha Peter, McFadden David W
Department of Surgery, West Virginia University, Morgantown, West Virginia 26505, USA.
Am Surg. 2004 Jan;70(1):45-8.
Over the past decade, a nonoperative approach toward the management of blunt hepatic trauma has become prevalent at most major urban trauma centers. To determine the applicability of the nonoperative approach in a rural setting, a 10-year retrospective review was conducted at a level I rural university-based trauma center. The Census Bureau defines ruralized areas to provide a better separation of urban and rural territory and population. A ruralized area is composed of one or more places and the adjacent surrounding territory that together have a maximum of 50,000 persons. West Virginia University is classified as a rural academic medical center and is situated in Morgantown, whose permanent population does not exceed 35,000. All patients with documented blunt hepatic trauma between July 1990 and June 2000 were identified and reviewed. To evaluate evolving trends, the patients were divided into two groups: group A (July 1, 1990-June 30, 1995) and group B (July 1, 1995-June 30, 2000). There were 236 patients with documented blunt hepatic trauma identified between July 1, 1990, and June 30, 2000). Overall, 70 per cent of patients were managed conservatively. When comparing the two groups, statistical significance was obtained in mean hospital length of stay (LOS) [19.8 days A vs. 9.1 days B (P < 0.0001)]; mean intensive care unit (ICU) days [15.2 days A vs. 5.3 days B (P < 0.0001)], blood transfusion [10 units A vs. 4.2 units B (P < 0.0016)], number of patients requiring surgery [52 (46%) A vs. 37 (30%) B (P < 0.022)]. There was only one death associated with nonoperative management. We have shown a definite trend toward nonoperative management of blunt hepatic trauma in a rural setting over the past decade. More than 70 per cent of our liver injury patients over the past 5 years have been managed nonoperatively, with statistically significant reductions in hospital LOS, ICU LOS, and transfusion requirements. We have found a definite trend over the past decade toward nonoperative management of blunt hepatic trauma in a rural setting. The rural setting with a delay in transport time to level I trauma center also did not significantly affect the outcome of the patients with nonoperative management of liver injuries. Approximately 78 per cent of our liver injury patients over the past 5 years have been managed nonoperatively and are associated with statistically significant reductions in hospital and ICU LOS and transfusion requirements.
在过去十年中,对于钝性肝外伤的非手术治疗方法在大多数大型城市创伤中心已变得普遍。为了确定非手术治疗方法在农村地区的适用性,在一所位于农村的一级大学创伤中心进行了一项为期10年的回顾性研究。美国人口普查局定义了农村化地区,以便更好地划分城市和农村区域及人口。农村化地区由一个或多个地点以及相邻的周边地区组成,这些地区的总人口最多为50000人。西弗吉尼亚大学被归类为农村学术医疗中心,位于摩根敦,其常住人口不超过35000人。确定并回顾了1990年7月至2000年6月期间所有有钝性肝外伤记录的患者。为了评估发展趋势,将患者分为两组:A组(1990年7月1日至1995年6月30日)和B组(1995年7月1日至2000年6月30日)。在1990年7月1日至2000年6月30日期间,共确定了236例有钝性肝外伤记录的患者。总体而言,70%的患者接受了保守治疗。比较两组时,在平均住院时间(LOS)[A组19.8天对B组9.1天(P<0.0001)]、平均重症监护病房(ICU)天数[A组15.2天对B组5.3天(P<0.0001)]、输血情况[ A组10单位对B组4.2单位(P<0.0016)]以及需要手术的患者数量[ A组52例(46%)对B组37例(30%)(P<0.022)]方面均具有统计学意义。非手术治疗仅出现1例死亡。我们已经表明,在过去十年中,农村地区钝性肝外伤的非手术治疗呈现出明确的趋势。在过去5年中,我们超过70%的肝损伤患者接受了非手术治疗,在住院时间、ICU住院时间和输血需求方面有统计学意义的显著减少。我们发现在过去十年中,农村地区钝性肝外伤的非手术治疗呈现出明确的趋势。运输至一级创伤中心时间延迟的农村地区,对于肝损伤非手术治疗患者的预后也没有显著影响。在过去5年中,我们大约78%的肝损伤患者接受了非手术治疗,并且在住院和ICU住院时间以及输血需求方面有统计学意义的显著减少。