Suppr超能文献

钝性创伤所致腹部实性脏器损伤的非手术治疗:神经功能障碍的影响

Nonoperative management of solid abdominal organ injuries from blunt trauma: impact of neurologic impairment.

作者信息

Shapiro M B, Nance M L, Schiller H J, Hoff W S, Kauder D R, Schwab C W

机构信息

Division of Trauma and Surgical Critical Care, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, USA.

出版信息

Am Surg. 2001 Aug;67(8):793-6.

Abstract

The role of nonoperative management of solid abdominal organ injury from blunt trauma in neurologically impaired patients has been questioned. A statewide trauma registry was reviewed from January 1993 through December 1995 for all adult (age >12 years) patients with blunt trauma and an abdominal solid organ injury (kidney, liver, or spleen) of Abbreviated Injury Scale score > or =2. Patients with initial hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90 mm Hg) were excluded. Patients were stratified by Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) into normal (GCS 15), mild to moderate (GCS 8-14), and severe (GCS < or =7) impairment groups. Management was either operative or nonoperative; failure of nonoperative management was defined as requiring laparotomy for intraabdominal injury more than 24 hours after admission. In the 3-year period 2327 patients sustained solid viscus injuries; 1561 of these patients were managed nonoperatively (66 per cent). The nonoperative approach was initiated less frequently in those patients with greater impairment in mental status: GCS 15, 71 per cent; GCS 8 to 14, 62 per cent; and GCS < or =7, 50 per cent. Mortality, hospital length of stay, and intensive care unit days were greater in operatively managed GCS 15 and 8 to 14 groups but were not different on the basis of management in the GCS < or =7 group. Failure of nonoperative management occurred in 94 patients (6%). There was no difference in the nonoperative failure rate between patients with normal mental status and those with mild to moderate or severe head injuries. Nonoperative management of neurologically impaired hemodynamically stable patients with blunt injuries of liver, spleen, or kidney is commonly practiced and is successful in more than 90 per cent of cases. No differences were noted in the rates of delayed laparotomy or survival between normal, mild to moderately head-injured, and severely head-injured patients.

摘要

钝性创伤所致腹部实性器官损伤在神经功能受损患者中的非手术治疗作用一直受到质疑。回顾了1993年1月至1995年12月全州创伤登记处中所有成年(年龄>12岁)钝性创伤且腹部实性器官损伤(肾、肝或脾)、简明损伤定级标准(AIS)评分≥2分的患者。排除初始低血压(收缩压<90 mmHg)的患者。根据格拉斯哥昏迷评分(GCS)将患者分为正常(GCS 15)、轻至中度(GCS 8 - 14)和重度(GCS≤7)损伤组。治疗方式为手术或非手术;非手术治疗失败定义为入院后24小时以上因腹内损伤需要剖腹手术。在这3年期间,2327例患者发生实性脏器损伤;其中1561例患者接受非手术治疗(66%)。精神状态受损程度较重的患者较少采用非手术治疗方法:GCS 15,71%;GCS 8至14,62%;GCS≤7,50%。接受手术治疗的GCS 15和8至14组患者的死亡率、住院时间和重症监护病房天数更高,但GCS≤7组患者的治疗方式对这些指标无差异。94例患者(6%)非手术治疗失败。精神状态正常的患者与轻度至中度或重度颅脑损伤患者的非手术失败率无差异。对肝、脾或肾钝性损伤且血流动力学稳定的神经功能受损患者进行非手术治疗是常见做法,且在90%以上的病例中是成功的。正常、轻度至中度颅脑损伤和重度颅脑损伤患者的延迟剖腹手术率或生存率无差异。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验