Garis Robert I, Clark Bartholomew E
School of Pharmacy and Health Professions, Creighton University, Omaha, NE 68178, USA.
J Am Pharm Assoc (2003). 2004 Jan-Feb;44(1):15-21. doi: 10.1331/154434504322713183.
To document the difference between what pharmacy benefits management companies (PBMs) charge employers and what they pay dispensing pharmacies for the drug ingredient portion of prescription transactions (the "spre
Descriptive, cross-sectional study.
Two large employer groups, each of which used a different PBM, and six independent community pharmacies participating in these plans during 2002.
Two sets of financial records issued by each of two PBMs were reviewed retrospectively, including 129 line-item prescription transactions billed to the employer and the line-item transaction information that accompanies the PBM payment to the dispensing pharmacy.
Spread between drug ingredient cost billed to the employer by the PBM and drug ingredient cost paid to the dispensing pharmacy by the PBM for brand name versus generic drug products.
For both PBMs, the mean (+/- SD) spread was dollar 12.29 +/- 27.93 per prescription, with a range of -dollar 1.67 to dollar 201.65. Considering all 129 transactions, the mean spreads for brand name and generic medications were significantly different from one another, with mean (+/- SD) spreads of dollar 4.65 +/- 10.47 and dollar 23.45 +/- 39.47 per prescription, respectively. The two PBMs differed significantly in their spreads for brand name drugs (dollar 3.20 +/- 2.85 and dollar 5.93 +/- 14.12), but the spreads for generic products did not achieve statistical significance in absolute dollars (dollar 10.83 +/- 13.58 and dollar 31.74 +/- 48.11) because of their greater variation (as reflected in the larger standard deviations). However, the percentages difference for generic products differed significantly.
This pilot study indicates the possibility of substantial and widely varying differences in the spread and spread percentage between PBMs for brand name and generic medications. A more transparent business model for the PBM industry could produce better relations with PBM clients and business partners, including community pharmacies.
记录药房福利管理公司(PBMs)向雇主收取的费用与它们就处方交易中的药品成分部分向配药药房支付的费用之间的差异(“价差”)。
描述性横断面研究。
两个大型雇主团体,每个团体使用不同的PBM,以及2002年期间参与这些计划的六家独立社区药房。
回顾性审查两家PBM各自出具的两套财务记录,包括向雇主开具账单的129笔明细处方交易以及PBM向配药药房付款时附带的明细交易信息。
PBM向雇主收取的药品成分成本与PBM向配药药房支付的品牌药和非专利药药品成分成本之间的价差。
对于两家PBM,每张处方的平均(±标准差)价差为12.29美元±27.93美元,范围为-1.67美元至201.65美元。考虑所有129笔交易,品牌药和非专利药的平均价差彼此有显著差异,每张处方的平均(±标准差)价差分别为4.65美元±10.47美元和23.45美元±39.47美元。两家PBM在品牌药价差方面有显著差异(3.20美元±2.85美元和5.93美元±14.12美元),但非专利药产品的价差在绝对金额上未达到统计学显著性(10.83美元±13.58美元和31.74美元±48.11美元),因为其变化更大(如较大的标准差所示)。然而,非专利药产品的百分比差异有显著不同。
这项试点研究表明,PBM在品牌药和非专利药的价差及价差百分比方面可能存在巨大且差异广泛的不同。PBM行业采用更透明的商业模式可能会改善与PBM客户及商业伙伴(包括社区药房)的关系。