Newbury Jenny, Hatherell Claire A
Dorothy House Hospice, Winsley BA15 2LE, UK.
Int J Palliat Nurs. 2004 Jan;10(1):24-31. doi: 10.12968/ijpn.2004.10.1.12016.
Discharging patients from community specialist palliative care services is a contentious issue. Although some specialist nursing teams discharge patients at the earliest opportunity and are open to re-referral, others retain patients as "pending", i.e. patients do not receive regular contact or intervention but remain on the caseload until a need arises. This anomaly is not surprising given the lack of evidence of good practice in the discharge of patients who no longer have specialist needs. This article describes an audit by a community specialist palliative care nursing team of patients discharged from their caseloads over a 6-month period from January to June 2002. The aims of the audit were to compare the reasons for discharge given by the nurse specialists with existing discharge criteria and to provide data for guidelines for good practice in discharging patients. The rate of re-referral for the discharged cohort was also measured. There were 199 patient discharges in the audit period with 23 being re-referred within 6 months of discharge. The reasons for discharge were generally broader than the discharge criteria and the nurses frequently emphasized to the patient, the family and primary carers that re-referral was welcomed as needs arise. The need for multicentre discharge audits was also highlighted.
让患者从社区专科姑息治疗服务中出院是一个颇具争议的问题。尽管一些专科护理团队会尽早让患者出院,并接受再次转诊,但其他团队会将患者列为“待处理”,即患者不再接受定期联系或干预,但仍在病例清单上,直到有需求出现。鉴于缺乏关于不再有专科需求的患者出院的良好实践证据,这种异常情况并不令人惊讶。本文描述了一个社区专科姑息治疗护理团队对2002年1月至6月这6个月期间从其病例清单上出院的患者进行的一次审计。审计的目的是将专科护士给出的出院原因与现有的出院标准进行比较,并为患者出院的良好实践指南提供数据。还对出院队列的再次转诊率进行了测量。在审计期间有199例患者出院,其中23例在出院后6个月内被再次转诊。出院原因通常比出院标准更宽泛,护士经常向患者、家属和主要护理人员强调,如有需求,欢迎再次转诊。多中心出院审计的必要性也得到了强调。