Starcevic Vladan, Linden Michael, Uhlenhuth E H, Kolar Dusan, Latas Milan
Department of Psychological Medicine, Nepean Hospital and University of Sydney, P.O. Box 63, Penrith, NSW 2751, Australia.
Psychiatry Res. 2004 Jan 30;125(1):41-52. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2003.11.001.
The main objective of this report was to identify patient characteristics that led psychiatrists in an academic anxiety disorders clinic to make a decision about intensive treatment of patients with panic disorder with agoraphobia (PDA) with cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) alone, CBT plus a high-potency benzodiazepine (CBT+BZ) or CBT combined with BZ and an antidepressant, fluoxetine (CBT+BZ+AD). On the basis of their clinical judgment and collaborative negotiation with the patient, psychiatrists chose one of the three treatment modalities for 102 PDA outpatients. Two stepwise logistic regressions were performed to explore pre-treatment patient characteristics the psychiatrists may have considered in choosing among these treatments. One regression examined the decision to add BZ to CBT, while the other examined the decision to add AD to CBT+BZ. Psychiatrists generally used combination treatments in patients with more severe PDA. CBT alone was a more likely choice for dominant anxiety-related cognitive phenomena. Patients with prominent panic attacks and somatic symptoms were more likely to be treated with CBT+BZ, while those who also had significant depressive symptoms and higher disability levels were more likely to receive CBT+BZ+AD. Patients in all three treatment groups showed significant reduction in symptoms during intensive treatment and reached similar end states. In a clinic setting where CBT is accepted as the basic treatment for PDA, psychiatrists added BZ to control prominent panic symptoms and added AD to elevate depressed mood and help cope with marked disability. These choices appear rational and resulted in substantial clinical improvement at the end of intensive treatment in the clinic.
本报告的主要目的是确定在学术性焦虑症诊所中,导致精神科医生决定对伴有广场恐惧症的惊恐障碍(PDA)患者仅采用认知行为疗法(CBT)、CBT加高效苯二氮䓬(CBT+BZ)或CBT联合BZ及抗抑郁药氟西汀(CBT+BZ+AD)进行强化治疗的患者特征。基于他们的临床判断以及与患者的共同协商,精神科医生为102名PDA门诊患者选择了三种治疗方式之一。进行了两步逻辑回归分析,以探究精神科医生在这些治疗方法中进行选择时可能考虑的治疗前患者特征。一次回归分析考察了在CBT基础上加用BZ的决定因素,另一次回归分析考察了在CBT+BZ基础上加用AD的决定因素。精神科医生通常对病情更严重的PDA患者采用联合治疗。对于以焦虑相关认知现象为主的患者,单独使用CBT是更可能的选择。伴有明显惊恐发作和躯体症状的患者更可能接受CBT+BZ治疗,而那些同时伴有显著抑郁症状和更高残疾水平的患者更可能接受CBT+BZ+AD治疗。所有三个治疗组的患者在强化治疗期间症状均有显著减轻,并达到了相似的最终状态。在一个将CBT作为PDA基本治疗方法的临床环境中,精神科医生加用BZ以控制突出的惊恐症状,加用AD以改善抑郁情绪并帮助应对明显的残疾状况。这些选择似乎是合理的,并且在诊所强化治疗结束时带来了显著的临床改善。