Watanabe Norio, Churchill Rachel, Furukawa Toshi A
Department of Psychiatry and Cognitive-Behavioral Medicine, Nagoya City University Graduate School of Medical Sciences, Nagoya, Japan.
BMC Psychiatry. 2007 May 14;7:18. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-7-18.
The efficacy of combined psychotherapy and benzodiazepine treatment for panic disorder is still unclear despite its widespread use. The present systematic review aims to examine its efficacy compared with either monotherapy alone.
All randomised trials comparing combined psychotherapy and benzodiazepine for panic disorder with either therapy alone were identified by comprehensive electronic search on the Cochrane Registers, by checking references of relevant studies and of other reviews, and by contacting experts in the field. Two reviewers independently checked eligibility of trials, assessed quality of trials and extracted data from eligible trials using a standardized data extraction form. Our primary outcome was "response" defined by global judgement. Authors of the original trials were contacted for further unpublished data. Meta-analyses were undertaken synthesizing data from all relevant trials.
Only two studies, which compared the combination with behaviour (exposure) therapy, met our eligibility criteria. Both studies had a 16-week intervention. Unpublished data were retrieved for one study. The relative risk for response for the combination was 1.25 (95%CI: 0.78 to 2.03) during acute phase treatment, 0.78 (0.45 to 1.35) at the end of treatment, and 0.62 (0.36 to 1.07) at 6-12 months follow-up. Some secondary outcomes hinted at superiority of the combination during acute phase treatment. One study was identified comparing the combination to benzodiazepine. The relative risk for response was 1.57 (0.83 to 2.98), 3.39 (1.03 to 11.21, statistically significant) and 2.31 (0.79 to 6.74) respectively. The superiority of the combination was observed on secondary outcomes at all the time points. No sub-group analyses were conducted due to the limited number of included trials.
Unlike some narrative reviews in the literature, our systematic search established the paucity of high quality evidence for or against the combined psychotherapy plus benzodiazepine therapy for panic disorder. Based on limited available published and unpublished data, however, the combined therapy is probably to be recommended over benzodiazepine alone for panic disorder with agoraphobia. The combination might be superior to behaviour therapy alone during the acute phase, but afterwards this trend may be reversed. We know little from these trials about their adverse effects.
尽管心理治疗与苯二氮䓬类药物联合治疗恐慌症已被广泛应用,但其疗效仍不明确。本系统评价旨在探究其与单一疗法相比的疗效。
通过全面检索Cochrane图书馆、检查相关研究及其他综述的参考文献,并联系该领域专家,确定了所有比较心理治疗与苯二氮䓬类药物联合治疗恐慌症与单一疗法的随机试验。两名评价者独立检查试验的纳入标准,评估试验质量,并使用标准化数据提取表从符合条件的试验中提取数据。我们的主要结局是通过整体判断定义的“反应”。与原始试验的作者联系以获取更多未发表的数据。对所有相关试验的数据进行荟萃分析。
仅有两项比较联合治疗与行为(暴露)疗法的研究符合我们的纳入标准。两项研究均进行了为期16周的干预。其中一项研究获取了未发表的数据。联合治疗在急性期治疗时反应的相对风险为1.25(95%CI:0.78至2.03),治疗结束时为0.78(0.45至1.35),在6至12个月随访时为0.62(0.36至1.07)。一些次要结局提示联合治疗在急性期治疗时有优势。确定了一项比较联合治疗与苯二氮䓬类药物的研究。反应的相对风险分别为1.57(0.83至2.98)、3.39(1.03至11.21,具有统计学意义)和2.31(0.79至6.74)。联合治疗在所有时间点的次要结局上均显示出优势。由于纳入试验数量有限,未进行亚组分析。
与文献中的一些叙述性综述不同,我们的系统检索发现,支持或反对心理治疗加苯二氮䓬类药物联合治疗恐慌症的高质量证据很少。然而,基于有限的已发表和未发表数据,对于伴有广场恐惧症的恐慌症,联合治疗可能比单独使用苯二氮䓬类药物更值得推荐。联合治疗在急性期可能优于单独的行为疗法,但之后这种趋势可能会逆转。从这些试验中我们对其不良反应了解甚少。