Forbes Margaret G, Dickson Kenneth R, Golden Teresa D, Hudak Paul, Doyle Robert D
University of North Texas, P.O. Box 310559, Denton, Texas 76203-0559, USA.
Environ Sci Technol. 2004 Feb 1;38(3):892-8. doi: 10.1021/es034341z.
Using surface flow constructed wetlands for long-term phosphorus (P) retention presents a challenge due to the fact that P is stored primarily in the sediments. Subsurface flow wetlands have the potential to greatly increase P retention; however, the substrate needs to have both high hydraulic conductivity and high P sorption capacity. The objective of our study was to assess the P retention capacity of two substrates, masonry sand and lightweight expanded shale. We used sorption/desorption isotherms, flow-through column experiments, and pilot-scale wetlands to quantify P retained from treated municipal wastewater. Langmuir sorption isotherms predicted that the expanded shale has a maximum sorption capacity of 971 mg/kg and the masonry sand 58.8 mg/kg. In column desorption and column flow-through experiments, the masonry sand desorbed P when exposed to dilute P solutions. The expanded shale, however, had very little desorption and phosphorus did not break through the columns during our experiment. In pilot cells, masonry sand retained (mean +/- standard deviation) 45 +/- 62 g P/m2/yr and expanded shale retained 164 +/- 110 g P/m2/yr. We conclude that only the expanded shale would be a suitable substrate for retaining P in a subsurface flow wetland.
