Palmer Shea T, Martin Denis J, Steedman Wilma M, Ravey John
Queen Margaret University College, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004 Jan;85(1):119-28. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(03)00432-5.
To determine if interferential current (IFC) or transcutaneous electric nerve stimulation (TENS) alters C and A delta fiber-mediated thermal perception thresholds.
Single-blind, randomized controlled trial.
Laboratory.
One hundred forty healthy women volunteers (mean age +/- standard deviation, 20.6+/-2.7 y).
Subjects were randomly and exclusively assigned to 1 of 7 groups (n=20 in each): 0, 5, and 100 Hz of IFC; 5 and 100 Hz of TENS; placebo and control stimulation. Stimulation was applied through 2 electrodes placed over the median nerve. Warm sensation, cold sensation, hot pain, and cold pain perception thresholds were measured from the thenar eminence by using a quantitative sensory testing device and a method of limits algorithm.
Warm sensation, cold sensation, hot pain, and cold pain thresholds (degrees C) before, during, and after stimulation.
There was a statistically significant effect of time for all 4 thermal perception thresholds (separate 2-way analyses of variance with repeated measures, all P<.001). There were no statistically significant differences between experimental groups, nor any interaction effects (all P>.05).
Neither IFC nor TENS altered C and A delta fiber-mediated thermal perception thresholds. The results suggest that any analgesic mechanisms with these modalities are likely to be complex.
确定干扰电流(IFC)或经皮电刺激神经疗法(TENS)是否会改变C纤维和Aδ纤维介导的热感觉阈值。
单盲随机对照试验。
实验室。
140名健康女性志愿者(平均年龄±标准差,20.6±2.7岁)。
受试者被随机且仅分配到7组中的1组(每组n = 20):0、5和100Hz的IFC;5和100Hz的TENS;安慰剂和对照刺激。通过置于正中神经上方的两个电极施加刺激。使用定量感觉测试设备和极限法算法从鱼际测量温暖感觉、寒冷感觉、热痛和冷痛感觉阈值。
刺激前、刺激期间和刺激后的温暖感觉、寒冷感觉、热痛和冷痛阈值(摄氏度)。
所有4种热感觉阈值的时间效应具有统计学意义(重复测量的单独双向方差分析,均P <.001)。实验组之间无统计学显著差异,也无任何交互作用(均P>.05)。
IFC和TENS均未改变C纤维和Aδ纤维介导的热感觉阈值。结果表明,这些方式的任何镇痛机制可能都很复杂。