Suppr超能文献

惊恐障碍中丙咪嗪与舍曲林的比较:24周治疗完成者。

Imipramine vs. sertraline in panic disorder: 24-week treatment completers.

作者信息

Mavissakalian Matig R

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.

出版信息

Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2003 Sep-Dec;15(3-4):171-80. doi: 10.1023/b:acli.0000008170.74985.b6.

Abstract

Despite the acknowledged favorable side effects profile of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), comparative studies have not found significant differences in efficacy between tricyclics (TCAs) such as imipramine and clomipramine, and SSRIs in the treatment of panic disorder. The present study focuses on treatment completers to inform patients who adhere to a recommended course of treatment on the possible differential patterns of improvement and of change in side effects between sertraline and imipramine. From an intent to treat consecutive sample of patients participating in the 24-week open phase protocolized treatment of a long-term controlled maintenance/discontinuation study, 20 imipramine completers and 16 sertraline completers with moderate to severe baseline symptomatology were compared using primarily repeated measures analysis of variance on measures of symptom severity, on 15 side effects systematically elicited using an inventory and on heart rate and weight. The results revealed greater early improvement with imipramine compared to sertraline but no enduring differences beyond week 8 of treatments. Side effects, in particular dry mouth, constipation, tremors, sweating, and cardiovascular complaints increased more in severity and were more frequent and persistent during imipramine than sertraline but, except for the 10 beats/min increase in heart rate, side effects were clinically insignificant at the end of both treatments. Change in sexual complaints and weight did not differ between the treatments. The more favorable side effect profile of SSRIs versus TCAs was demonstrated even in the best case scenario of treatment completers. The more rapid improvement with imipramine needs replication but, tentatively, it may be attributed to the greater motivational effects toward action observed with noradrenergic or dual action antidepressants compared to SSRIs.

摘要

尽管公认选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRI)具有良好的副作用特征,但比较研究并未发现三环类药物(TCA)如丙咪嗪和氯米帕明与SSRI在治疗惊恐障碍方面的疗效存在显著差异。本研究聚焦于完成治疗的患者,旨在告知坚持推荐治疗方案的患者,舍曲林和丙咪嗪在改善模式及副作用变化方面可能存在的差异。从参与一项长期对照维持/停药研究的24周开放期标准化治疗的连续意向性治疗样本中,选取20名完成丙咪嗪治疗的患者和16名完成舍曲林治疗且基线症状为中度至重度的患者,主要使用重复测量方差分析,比较症状严重程度、用清单系统引出的15种副作用以及心率和体重的测量值。结果显示,与舍曲林相比,丙咪嗪在早期改善更明显,但在治疗第8周后无持续差异。副作用方面,特别是口干、便秘、震颤、出汗和心血管不适,丙咪嗪组的严重程度增加更多,且在治疗期间比舍曲林组更频繁和持久,但除心率增加10次/分钟外,两种治疗结束时副作用在临床上均无显著意义。两种治疗在性方面的不适和体重变化上没有差异。即使在完成治疗的最佳情况下,也证明了SSRI相对于TCA具有更有利的副作用特征。丙咪嗪更快的改善效果需要重复验证,但初步来看,这可能归因于与SSRI相比,去甲肾上腺素能或双重作用抗抑郁药对行动具有更大的促动作用。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验