• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Pharmacological treatments in panic disorder in adults: a network meta-analysis.成人惊恐障碍的药物治疗:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 28;11(11):CD012729. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012729.pub3.
2
Antidepressants versus placebo for panic disorder in adults.成人惊恐障碍患者使用抗抑郁药与安慰剂的对照研究
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 5;4(4):CD010676. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010676.pub2.
3
New generation antidepressants for depression in children and adolescents: a network meta-analysis.新一代抗抑郁药治疗儿童和青少年抑郁症:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 May 24;5(5):CD013674. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013674.pub2.
4
Vortioxetine for depression in adults.伏硫西汀用于成人抑郁症治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 5;7(7):CD011520. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011520.pub2.
5
Psychological therapies versus pharmacological interventions for panic disorder with or without agoraphobia in adults.成人伴或不伴有广场恐惧症的惊恐障碍的心理治疗与药物干预对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Oct 12;10(10):CD011170. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011170.pub2.
6
Antidepressants for the treatment of depression in people with cancer.用于治疗癌症患者抑郁症的抗抑郁药。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 23;4(4):CD011006. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011006.pub3.
7
Psychological therapies for panic disorder with or without agoraphobia in adults: a network meta-analysis.成人伴或不伴有广场恐惧症的惊恐障碍的心理治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 13;4(4):CD011004. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011004.pub2.
8
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.成人全身麻醉后预防术后恶心呕吐的药物:网状Meta分析
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2.
9
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Dec 22;12(12):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub2.
10
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.慢性斑块状银屑病的全身药理学治疗:一项网状Meta分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jan 9;1(1):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub3.

引用本文的文献

1
The Bidirectional Relationship Between FGIDs and Anxiety: Pathophysiological Mechanisms and New Therapeutic Strategies.功能性胃肠病与焦虑症的双向关系:病理生理机制及新治疗策略
Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2025 Aug;53(4):914-926. doi: 10.62641/aep.v53i4.1852.
2
Association Between Polygenic Risk Scores and Treatment Response to Antidepressants, Benzodiazepines, and Antihistamines in Anxiety and Depression.多基因风险评分与焦虑症和抑郁症患者对抗抑郁药、苯二氮䓬类药物及抗组胺药治疗反应之间的关联
Biol Psychiatry Glob Open Sci. 2025 Feb 18;5(3):100470. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsgos.2025.100470. eCollection 2025 May.
3
Difficult-to-Treat Anxiety: A Neurocomputational Framework.难治性焦虑:一种神经计算框架
Biol Psychiatry Cogn Neurosci Neuroimaging. 2025 Mar 28. doi: 10.1016/j.bpsc.2025.03.008.
4
The Efficacy of Fluvoxamine in Anxiety Disorders and Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder: An Overview of Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses.氟伏沙明治疗焦虑症和强迫症的疗效:系统评价与荟萃分析概述
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2025 Feb 28;18(3):353. doi: 10.3390/ph18030353.
5
Freud's 1926 conjecture is confirmed: evidence from the dorsal periaqueductal gray in mice that human psychological defense against internal instinctual threat evolved from animal motor defense against external predatory threat.弗洛伊德1926年的推测得到了证实:来自小鼠中脑导水管周围灰质背侧的证据表明,人类针对内部本能威胁的心理防御是从动物针对外部捕食性威胁的运动防御进化而来的。
Front Psychol. 2024 Sep 24;15:1427816. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1427816. eCollection 2024.
6
Biomarkers of cognitive and memory decline in psychotropic drug users.精神药物使用者认知和记忆衰退的生物标志物。
J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2025 Jan;132(1):39-59. doi: 10.1007/s00702-024-02837-4. Epub 2024 Oct 8.
7
Association between benzodiazepine anxiolytic polypharmacy and concomitant psychotropic medications in Japan: a retrospective cross-sectional study.日本苯二氮䓬类抗焦虑药联合用药与同时使用的精神药物之间的关联:一项回顾性横断面研究。
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Jul 4;15:1405049. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1405049. eCollection 2024.
8
: Examining the best time of day for exercise: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.探究一天中锻炼的最佳时间:一项系统评价和网状荟萃分析
Campbell Syst Rev. 2021 Jun 21;17(2):e1144. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1144. eCollection 2021 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors in the treatment of depression, anxiety, and post-traumatic stress disorder in substance use disorders: a Bayesian meta-analysis.选择性5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂用于治疗物质使用障碍中的抑郁、焦虑和创伤后应激障碍:一项贝叶斯荟萃分析
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Jun;78(6):931-942. doi: 10.1007/s00228-022-03303-4. Epub 2022 Mar 5.
2
Comparative safety of chronic versus intermittent benzodiazepine prescribing in older adults: A population-based cohort study.比较老年人群中长期与间歇性苯二氮䓬类药物处方的安全性:基于人群的队列研究。
J Psychopharmacol. 2022 Apr;36(4):460-469. doi: 10.1177/02698811211069096. Epub 2022 Feb 1.
3
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of psychotherapies for panic disorder with or without agoraphobia: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.伴有或不伴有广场恐惧症的惊恐障碍的心理治疗的疗效和可接受性比较:随机对照试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Br J Psychiatry. 2022 Sep;221(3):507-519. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2021.148.
4
Drug treatment for panic disorder with or without agoraphobia: systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.伴有或不伴有广场恐惧症的惊恐障碍的药物治疗:随机对照试验的系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
BMJ. 2022 Jan 19;376:e066084. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2021-066084.
5
Initial treatment choices to achieve sustained response in major depression: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.在重度抑郁症中实现持续缓解的初始治疗选择:一项系统评价和网状荟萃分析
World Psychiatry. 2021 Oct;20(3):387-396. doi: 10.1002/wps.20906.
6
Risks and Benefits of Benzodiazepines.苯二氮䓬类药物的风险与益处
JAMA. 2021 Jun 1;325(21):2208. doi: 10.1001/jama.2021.4513.
7
Comparative efficacy and acceptability of antidepressants and benzodiazepines for the treatment of panic disorder: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.抗抑郁药和苯二氮䓬类药物治疗惊恐障碍的疗效及可接受性比较:一项系统评价和网状Meta分析
Asian J Psychiatr. 2021 Jun;60:102664. doi: 10.1016/j.ajp.2021.102664. Epub 2021 May 3.
8
Balancing the Risks and Benefits of Benzodiazepines.权衡苯二氮䓬类药物的风险与益处
JAMA. 2021 Jan 26;325(4):347-348. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.22106.
9
May antidepressant drugs worsen the conditions they are supposed to treat? The clinical foundations of the oppositional model of tolerance.抗抑郁药物会使它们本应治疗的病情恶化吗?耐受性对立模型的临床基础。
Ther Adv Psychopharmacol. 2020 Nov 2;10:2045125320970325. doi: 10.1177/2045125320970325. eCollection 2020.
10
Benzodiazepines: it's time to return to the evidence.苯二氮䓬类药物:是时候回归证据了。
Br J Psychiatry. 2021 Mar;218(3):125-127. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2020.164.

成人惊恐障碍的药物治疗:网络荟萃分析。

Pharmacological treatments in panic disorder in adults: a network meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Western University, St Thomas, Canada.

Centre for Reviews and Dissemination, University of York, York, UK.

出版信息

Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Nov 28;11(11):CD012729. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012729.pub3.

DOI:10.1002/14651858.CD012729.pub3
PMID:38014714
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10683020/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

A panic attack is a discrete period of fear or anxiety that has a rapid onset and reaches a peak within 10 minutes. The main symptoms involve bodily systems, such as racing heart, chest pain, sweating, shaking, dizziness, flushing, churning stomach, faintness and breathlessness. Other recognised panic attack symptoms involve fearful cognitions, such as the fear of collapse, going mad or dying, and derealisation (the sensation that the world is unreal). Panic disorder is common in the general population with a prevalence of 1% to 4%. The treatment of panic disorder includes psychological and pharmacological interventions, including antidepressants and benzodiazepines.

OBJECTIVES

To compare, via network meta-analysis, individual drugs (antidepressants and benzodiazepines) or placebo in terms of efficacy and acceptability in the acute treatment of panic disorder, with or without agoraphobia. To rank individual active drugs for panic disorder (antidepressants, benzodiazepines and placebo) according to their effectiveness and acceptability. To rank drug classes for panic disorder (selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs), serotonin-norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs), mono-amine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) and benzodiazepines (BDZs) and placebo) according to their effectiveness and acceptability. To explore heterogeneity and inconsistency between direct and indirect evidence in a network meta-analysis.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Common Mental Disorders Specialised Register, CENTRAL, CDSR, MEDLINE, Ovid Embase and PsycINFO to 26 May 2022.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised controlled trials (RCTs) of people aged 18 years or older of either sex and any ethnicity with clinically diagnosed panic disorder, with or without agoraphobia. We included trials that compared the effectiveness of antidepressants and benzodiazepines with each other or with a placebo.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently screened titles/abstracts and full texts, extracted data and assessed risk of bias. We analysed dichotomous data and continuous data as risk ratios (RRs), mean differences (MD) or standardised mean differences (SMD): response to treatment (i.e. substantial improvement from baseline as defined by the original investigators: dichotomous outcome), total number of dropouts due to any reason (as a proxy measure of treatment acceptability: dichotomous outcome), remission (i.e. satisfactory end state as defined by global judgement of the original investigators: dichotomous outcome), panic symptom scales and global judgement (continuous outcome), frequency of panic attacks (as recorded, for example, by a panic diary; continuous outcome), agoraphobia (dichotomous outcome). We assessed the certainty of evidence using threshold analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

Overall, we included 70 trials in this review. Sample sizes ranged between 5 and 445 participants in each arm, and the total sample size per study ranged from 10 to 1168. Thirty-five studies included sample sizes of over 100 participants. There is evidence from 48 RCTs (N = 10,118) that most medications are more effective in the response outcome than placebo. In particular, diazepam, alprazolam, clonazepam, paroxetine, venlafaxine, clomipramine, fluoxetine and adinazolam showed the strongest effect, with diazepam, alprazolam and clonazepam ranking as the most effective. We found heterogeneity in most of the comparisons, but our threshold analyses suggest that this is unlikely to impact the findings of the network meta-analysis. Results from 64 RCTs (N = 12,310) suggest that most medications are associated with either a reduced or similar risk of dropouts to placebo. Alprazolam and diazepam were associated with a lower dropout rate compared to placebo and were ranked as the most tolerated of all the medications examined. Thirty-two RCTs (N = 8569) were included in the remission outcome. Most medications were more effective than placebo, namely desipramine, fluoxetine, clonazepam, diazepam, fluvoxamine, imipramine, venlafaxine and paroxetine, and their effects were clinically meaningful. Amongst these medications, desipramine and alprazolam were ranked highest. Thirty-five RCTs (N = 8826) are included in the continuous outcome reduction in panic scale scores. Brofaromine, clonazepam and reboxetine had the strongest reductions in panic symptoms compared to placebo, but results were based on either one trial or very small trials. Forty-one RCTs (N = 7853) are included in the frequency of panic attack outcome. Only clonazepam and alprazolam showed a strong reduction in the frequency of panic attacks compared to placebo, and were ranked highest. Twenty-six RCTs (N = 7044) provided data for agoraphobia. The strongest reductions in agoraphobia symptoms were found for citalopram, reboxetine, escitalopram, clomipramine and diazepam, compared to placebo. For the pooled intervention classes, we examined the two primary outcomes (response and dropout). The classes of medication were: SSRIs, SNRIs, TCAs, MAOIs and BDZs. For the response outcome, all classes of medications examined were more effective than placebo. TCAs as a class ranked as the most effective, followed by BDZs and MAOIs. SSRIs as a class ranked fifth on average, while SNRIs were ranked lowest. When we compared classes of medication with each other for the response outcome, we found no difference between classes. Comparisons between MAOIs and TCAs and between BDZs and TCAs also suggested no differences between these medications, but the results were imprecise. For the dropout outcome, BDZs were the only class associated with a lower dropout compared to placebo and were ranked first in terms of tolerability. The other classes did not show any difference in dropouts compared to placebo. In terms of ranking, TCAs are on average second to BDZs, followed by SNRIs, then by SSRIs and lastly by MAOIs. BDZs were associated with lower dropout rates compared to SSRIs, SNRIs and TCAs. The quality of the studies comparing antidepressants with placebo was moderate, while the quality of the studies comparing BDZs with placebo and antidepressants was low.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: In terms of efficacy, SSRIs, SNRIs (venlafaxine), TCAs, MAOIs and BDZs may be effective, with little difference between classes. However, it is important to note that the reliability of these findings may be limited due to the overall low quality of the studies, with all having unclear or high risk of bias across multiple domains. Within classes, some differences emerged. For example, amongst the SSRIs paroxetine and fluoxetine seem to have stronger evidence of efficacy than sertraline. Benzodiazepines appear to have a small but significant advantage in terms of tolerability (incidence of dropouts) over other classes.

摘要

背景

惊恐发作是一种突然发作并在 10 分钟内达到高峰的离散性恐惧或焦虑期。主要症状涉及身体系统,例如心跳加速、胸痛、出汗、颤抖、头晕、脸红、胃部不适、昏厥和呼吸困难。其他公认的惊恐发作症状涉及恐惧认知,例如崩溃、发疯或死亡的恐惧,以及现实感丧失(世界不真实的感觉)。惊恐障碍在普通人群中很常见,患病率为 1%至 4%。惊恐障碍的治疗包括心理和药物干预,包括抗抑郁药和苯二氮䓬类药物。

目的

通过网络荟萃分析,比较在伴有或不伴有广场恐惧症的惊恐障碍急性治疗中,个体药物(抗抑郁药和苯二氮䓬类药物)或安慰剂的疗效和可接受性。根据其疗效和可接受性,对惊恐障碍(抗抑郁药、苯二氮䓬类药物和安慰剂)的有效活性药物进行排名。根据其疗效和可接受性,对惊恐障碍药物类别(选择性 5-羟色胺再摄取抑制剂(SSRIs)、5-羟色胺-去甲肾上腺素再摄取抑制剂(SNRIs)、三环抗抑郁药(TCAs)、单胺氧化酶抑制剂(MAOIs)和苯二氮䓬类药物(BDZs)和安慰剂)进行排名。探索网络荟萃分析中直接证据和间接证据之间的异质性和不一致性。

检索方法

我们检索了 Cochrane 常见精神障碍专病注册库、CENTRAL、CDSR、MEDLINE、Ovid Embase 和 PsycINFO,检索时间截至 2022 年 5 月 26 日。

选择标准

我们纳入了年龄在 18 岁及以上、任何性别和任何种族、具有临床诊断为惊恐障碍、伴有或不伴有广场恐惧症的随机对照试验(RCTs)。我们纳入了比较抗抑郁药和苯二氮䓬类药物与彼此或与安慰剂疗效的试验。

数据收集和分析

两名作者独立筛选标题/摘要和全文,提取数据并评估偏倚风险。我们分析了二分类数据和连续数据,包括反应率(即治疗后从基线显著改善的情况,定义为原始研究者:二分类结局)、任何原因导致的总辍学人数(作为治疗可接受性的替代指标:二分类结局)、缓解率(即原始研究者定义的满意结局:二分类结局)、惊恐症状量表和总体判断(连续结局)、惊恐发作频率(例如,通过惊恐日记记录:连续结局)、广场恐惧症(二分类结局)。我们使用阈值分析评估证据的确定性。

主要结果

总体而言,我们在本次综述中纳入了 70 项研究。每个臂的样本量在 5 到 445 人之间,每项研究的总样本量在 10 到 1168 人之间。35 项研究的样本量超过 100 人。有 48 项 RCT(N=10118)的证据表明,大多数药物在反应结局方面比安慰剂更有效。特别是,地西泮、阿普唑仑、氯硝西泮、帕罗西汀、文拉法辛、氯米帕明、氟西汀和安他唑仑的效果最强,地西泮、阿普唑仑和氯硝西泮的效果排名最高。我们在大多数比较中发现了异质性,但我们的阈值分析表明,这不太可能影响网络荟萃分析的结果。64 项 RCT(N=12310)的结果表明,大多数药物与安慰剂相比,辍学风险降低或相似。阿普唑仑和地西泮的辍学率低于安慰剂,并且在所有接受检查的药物中被评为最耐受的药物。32 项 RCT(N=8569)被纳入缓解结局。大多数药物比安慰剂更有效,即去甲丙咪嗪、氟西汀、氯硝西泮、地西泮、氟伏沙明、丙咪嗪、文拉法辛和帕罗西汀,其效果具有临床意义。在这些药物中,去甲丙咪嗪和阿普唑仑的排名最高。35 项 RCT(N=8826)被纳入惊恐量表评分的连续结局。与安慰剂相比,布罗法罗明、氯硝西泮和瑞波西汀的惊恐症状减轻幅度最大,但结果基于一项或非常小的试验。41 项 RCT(N=7853)被纳入惊恐发作频率的结局。只有氯硝西泮和阿普唑仑与安慰剂相比,惊恐发作的频率有明显降低,并且排名最高。26 项 RCT(N=7044)提供了惊恐障碍的结果。与安慰剂相比,西酞普兰、瑞波西汀、艾司西酞普兰、氯米帕明和地西泮对惊恐症状的减轻幅度最大。对于汇集的干预类,我们检查了两个主要结局(反应和辍学)。药物类别包括:SSRIs、SNRIs、TCAs、MAOIs 和 BDZs。对于反应结局,所有检查的药物类别都比安慰剂更有效。TCAs 类药物的疗效排名最高,其次是 BDZs 和 MAOIs。SSRIs 类药物平均排名第五,而 SNRIs 类药物排名最低。当我们比较类药物之间的反应结局时,我们发现类药物之间没有差异。比较 MAOIs 和 TCAs 以及 BDZs 和 TCAs 也表明这些药物之间没有差异,但结果不精确。对于辍学结局,BDZs 是唯一一种与安慰剂相比辍学率较低的药物类别,并且在耐受性方面排名第一。其他类别与安慰剂相比在辍学方面没有差异。在排名方面,TCAs 平均排名第二,仅次于 BDZs,然后是 SNRIs,其次是 SSRIs,最后是 MAOIs。BDZs 与 SSRIs、SNRIs 和 TCAs 相比,辍学率较低。比较抗抑郁药与安慰剂的研究质量为中等,而比较 BDZs 与安慰剂和抗抑郁药的研究质量为低。

作者结论

在疗效方面,SSRIs、SNRIs(文拉法辛)、TCAs、MAOIs 和 BDZs 可能有效,类药物之间没有差异。然而,需要注意的是,由于研究总体质量较低,存在偏倚的可能性较大,这些发现的可靠性可能受到限制。在类别内,一些差异出现了。例如,在 SSRIs 中,帕罗西汀和氟西汀似乎比舍曲林更有效。与其他类别相比,苯二氮䓬类药物在耐受性(辍学率)方面似乎具有微小但显著的优势。