Suppr超能文献

高剂量奥氮平与氯氮平治疗难治性精神分裂症的不良反应及实验室参数

Adverse effects and laboratory parameters of high-dose olanzapine vs. clozapine in treatment-resistant schizophrenia.

作者信息

Kelly Deanna L, Conley Robert R, Richardson Charles M, Tamminga Carol A, Carpenter William T

机构信息

Maryland Psychiatric Research Center, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland 21228, USA.

出版信息

Ann Clin Psychiatry. 2003 Sep-Dec;15(3-4):181-6. doi: 10.1023/b:acli.0000008171.90644.f8.

Abstract

Patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia pose a major challenge to caregivers since only clozapine is documented as having superior efficacy in this population. Although olanzapine is similar to clozapine in structure and receptor profile, it has not been proven to have superior efficacy for this patient group. Nonetheless, olanzapine is being increasingly used in higher doses as clinicians attempt to find a more effective and tolerable therapy for refractory patients. Furthermore, there are little data comparing olanzapine and clozapine in this population. Thirteen patients participated in a randomized double-blind 16-week crossover study of clozapine therapy (450 mg/day) compared to high doses of olanzapine (50 mg/day). No patients on olanzapine responded while 20% responded to clozapine treatment. Olanzapine patients tended to experience higher rates of anticholinergic effects such as dry mouth (80 vs. 20%) and blurry vision (40 vs. 0%). Clozapine-treated patients had higher rates of sialorrhea (80 vs. 10%), sweating (50 vs. 10%), dyspepsia (70 vs. 30%), and lethargy (90 vs. 60%). Neither treatment was associated with significant akathisia. Liver enzyme elevation and lipids were higher with clozapine treatment. Mean weight gain in the initial 8 weeks was 3.4 kg for olanzapine and 1.2 kg for clozapine. High doses of olanzapine during 8 weeks of treatment did not increase lipids and liver enzymes like clozapine did. Olanzapine at 50 mg/day may be associated with more anticholinergic effects and weight gain than clozapine.

摘要

难治性精神分裂症患者给护理人员带来了重大挑战,因为只有氯氮平被证明对这一人群具有卓越疗效。尽管奥氮平在结构和受体分布方面与氯氮平相似,但尚未证明它对该患者群体具有卓越疗效。尽管如此,随着临床医生试图为难治性患者找到更有效且耐受性更好的治疗方法,奥氮平的使用剂量越来越高。此外,在这一人群中比较奥氮平和氯氮平的数据很少。13名患者参与了一项随机双盲的16周交叉研究,比较氯氮平治疗(450毫克/天)与高剂量奥氮平(50毫克/天)。接受奥氮平治疗的患者无一人有反应,而20%接受氯氮平治疗的患者有反应。服用奥氮平的患者往往出现更高比例的抗胆碱能效应,如口干(80%对20%)和视力模糊(40%对0%)。接受氯氮平治疗的患者流涎(80%对10%)、出汗(50%对10%)、消化不良(70%对30%)和嗜睡(90%对60%)的比例更高。两种治疗均未伴有明显的静坐不能。氯氮平治疗时肝酶升高和血脂更高。奥氮平治疗最初8周的平均体重增加为3.4千克,氯氮平为1.2千克。治疗8周期间高剂量奥氮平不像氯氮平那样会增加血脂和肝酶。每天50毫克的奥氮平可能比氯氮平伴有更多的抗胆碱能效应和体重增加。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验