Meltzer Herbert Y, Bobo William V, Roy Ajanta, Jayathilake Karu, Chen Yuejin, Ertugrul Aygun, Anil Yağcioğlu A Elif, Small Joyce G
Department of Psychiatry, Vanderbilt University School of Medicine, Nashville, Tenn., USA.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2008 Feb;69(2):274-85. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v69n0214.
Clozapine, despite its side-effect burden, has been considered to be the drug of choice for patients with schizophrenia whose psychotic symptoms fail to respond adequately to other anti-psychotic drugs. There are conflicting data concerning the potential utility of olanzapine in treatment-resistant schizophrenia at doses beyond the 10- to 20-mg/day range that has proven to be effective for most nonrefractory patients with schizophrenia.
The main objective of this study was to compare the efficacy and tolerability of high-dose olanzapine (target dose, 25-45 mg/day) and clozapine (300-900 mg/day) in patients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder who had failed to respond adequately to prior treatment with other antipsychotic drugs.
STUDY DESIGN/METHOD: This 6-month, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study compared the efficacy and tolerability of olanzapine (mean dose, 34 mg/day; N = 19) or clozapine (mean dose, 564 mg/day; N = 21) in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder, diagnosed according to DSM-IV criteria. Outcome measures included psychopathology, cognitive performance (as assessed with a comprehensive neuropsychological test battery), and tolerability. The study was conducted between May 2000 and December 2003.
Robust and significant (mostly p < .001) improvement in multiple measures of psychopathology, mainly between 6 weeks and 6 months of treatment, was found in both treatment groups, with no significant difference between the 2 treatments except for the Global Assessment of Functioning score, which favored clozapine (p = .01). Improvement in some domains of cognition was significant-and equivalent for both drugs, as well. Nonsignificantly different improvement in Verbal List Learning-Immediate Recall (p < .05), Controlled Word Association Test (p < .05), and Digit Symbol Substitution Test (p < .001) was found. There were no significant differences in extrapyramidal symptoms. Weight gain was significantly (p = .01) greater with olanzapine.
Olanzapine, at higher than customary doses, demonstrated similar efficacy to clozapine in treatment-resistant schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder in this study. However, the small sample size precludes definitively concluding that the 2 treatments are equivalent, at these doses, in treatment-resistant schizophrenia. The metabolic side effects of olanzapine are a limitation in its use.
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00179231.
氯氮平尽管有副作用负担,但一直被认为是精神分裂症患者的首选药物,这些患者的精神病症状对其他抗精神病药物反应不佳。关于奥氮平在超过10至20毫克/天剂量范围(已证明对大多数非难治性精神分裂症患者有效)用于难治性精神分裂症的潜在效用,存在相互矛盾的数据。
本研究的主要目的是比较高剂量奥氮平(目标剂量,25 - 45毫克/天)和氯氮平(300 - 900毫克/天)对先前使用其他抗精神病药物治疗反应不佳的精神分裂症或分裂情感性障碍患者的疗效和耐受性。
研究设计/方法:这项为期6个月的随机、双盲、平行组研究比较了奥氮平(平均剂量,34毫克/天;N = 19)或氯氮平(平均剂量,564毫克/天;N = 21)对根据DSM - IV标准诊断的难治性精神分裂症或分裂情感性障碍患者的疗效和耐受性。结果测量包括精神病理学、认知表现(通过综合神经心理测试电池评估)和耐受性。该研究于2000年5月至2003年12月进行。
在两个治疗组中,主要在治疗的6周和6个月之间,多项精神病理学测量指标都有显著(大多p <.001)改善,除了功能总体评估得分有利于氯氮平(p =.01)外,两种治疗之间没有显著差异。两种药物在某些认知领域的改善也很显著且相当。在言语列表学习 - 即时回忆(p <.05)、受控词语联想测试(p <.05)和数字符号替换测试(p <.001)方面发现改善无显著差异。锥体外系症状没有显著差异。奥氮平导致的体重增加显著更大(p =.01)。
在本研究中,高于常规剂量的奥氮平在难治性精神分裂症和分裂情感性障碍中显示出与氯氮平相似的疗效。然而,样本量小使得无法确切得出在这些剂量下两种治疗在难治性精神分裂症中是等效的结论。奥氮平的代谢副作用是其使用的一个限制。
ClinicalTrials.gov标识符NCT00179231。