Bartoli M L, Bacci E, Carnevali S, Cianchetti S, Dente F L, Di Franco A, Giannini D, Taccola M, Vagaggini B, Paggiaro P L
Cardiothoracic Department, Respiratory Pathophysiology, Ospedale di Cisanello, University of Pisa, via Paradisa 2, Pisa 56124, Italy.
Respir Med. 2004 Feb;98(2):184-93. doi: 10.1016/j.rmed.2003.09.012.
In the aim to evaluate the relationship between sputum eosinophil percentages and eosinophil cationic protein (ECP) concentrations, as markers of airway inflammation, and different Levels of asthma severity, we examined 223 patients consecutively observed in our asthma clinic. Diagnosis of asthma was made according to internationally accepted criteria. Asthma severity was evaluated according to frequency of symptoms, FEV1, peak expiratory flow variability and level of asthma treatment needed to control asthma. Spontaneous or induced sputum was collected. Adequate sputum samples were obtained in 68 untreated subjects and in 117 subjects regularly treated with ICS. A control group of 14 normal subjects was also examined. In untreated subjects, mild intermittent asthmatics showed a lower sputum eosinophil percentage in comparison with other groups of asthma severity, while no difference in ECP levels was detected. In treated subjects, severe asthmatics showed higher levels of sputum eosinophils and ECP in comparison with other groups of asthma severity. Mild persistent and moderate persistent patients did not differ for sputum eosinophils or ECP in both untreated and treated subjects. Controls were significantly different from all groups of untreated and treated asthmatics. In conclusion, the assessment of asthma severity according to clinical and functional findings only partially corresponds to the severity of eosinophilic airway inflammation as assessed by induced sputum analysis.
为了评估作为气道炎症标志物的痰液嗜酸性粒细胞百分比和嗜酸性粒细胞阳离子蛋白(ECP)浓度与不同程度哮喘严重程度之间的关系,我们对在我们哮喘诊所连续观察的223例患者进行了检查。哮喘的诊断依据国际公认标准。根据症状发作频率、第一秒用力呼气容积(FEV1)、呼气峰值流速变异性以及控制哮喘所需的哮喘治疗水平来评估哮喘严重程度。收集自发咳痰或诱导痰。在68例未治疗的受试者和117例规律吸入糖皮质激素(ICS)治疗的受试者中获得了足够的痰液样本。还检查了14名正常受试者组成的对照组。在未治疗的受试者中,轻度间歇性哮喘患者的痰液嗜酸性粒细胞百分比低于其他哮喘严重程度组,而ECP水平未检测到差异。在接受治疗的受试者中,重度哮喘患者的痰液嗜酸性粒细胞和ECP水平高于其他哮喘严重程度组。在未治疗和接受治疗的受试者中,轻度持续性和中度持续性患者的痰液嗜酸性粒细胞或ECP无差异。对照组与所有未治疗和接受治疗的哮喘患者组有显著差异。总之,根据临床和功能表现评估的哮喘严重程度仅部分对应于通过诱导痰分析评估的嗜酸性粒细胞气道炎症的严重程度。