Kida Tetsuo, Nishihira Yoshiaki, Wasaka Toshiaki, Nakata Hiroki, Sakamoto Masanori
Doctoral Program in Health and Sports Sciences, University of Tsukuba, Tennoudai 1-1-1, Tsukuba, Japan.
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2004 Mar;19(1):33-9. doi: 10.1016/j.cogbrainres.2003.10.016.
The modulation of the somatosensory N140 was examined in a selective attention task where a control condition was applied and the interstimulus interval (ISI) was varied. Electrical stimuli were randomly presented to the left index (p=0.4) and middle fingers (p=0.1), and right index (p=0.4) and middle fingers (p=0.1). In the attend-right condition, subjects were instructed to count silently the number of infrequent target stimuli presented to the right middle finger, and to the left middle finger in the attend-left condition. They had no task in the control condition. Each condition was performed with two different sets of ISI (mean 400 vs. 800 ms). The somatosensory N140 elicited by frequent standard stimuli was analyzed. The N140 amplitude was larger for the attended ERP compared to the control and unattended ERPs. This attention effect was more marked at the frontal electrodes compared to the temporal electrodes contralateral to the stimulation side. Furthermore, the attention effect at the frontal electrode was larger when the ISI was 800 ms than when it was 400 ms. The N140 amplitude did not differ between the control and unattended ERPs, which might show that a small processing negativity (PN) occurred during the control condition or difference in vigilance level between them. In conclusion, the early lateral ("temporal") and late midline ("frontal") components of the N1 (N140) show different behavior, and thus may have different functional significance. Enhancement of the attention effect at the frontal electrode in the longer ISI condition supports the hypothesis that it is related to stronger, voluntary maintenance of the attentional trace.
在一项选择性注意任务中,研究了体感N140的调制情况,该任务应用了对照条件并改变了刺激间隔(ISI)。电刺激随机施加于左手食指(概率为0.4)和中指(概率为0.1),以及右手食指(概率为0.4)和中指(概率为0.1)。在注意右侧条件下,受试者被要求默默数出呈现给右手中指的罕见目标刺激的数量,在注意左侧条件下则数出呈现给左手中指的罕见目标刺激的数量。在对照条件下他们没有任务。每个条件均采用两组不同的ISI(平均400毫秒与800毫秒)进行。分析了由频繁标准刺激诱发的体感N140。与对照ERP和未注意ERP相比,注意ERP诱发的N140波幅更大。与刺激侧对侧的颞电极相比,额叶电极处的这种注意效应更为明显。此外,当ISI为800毫秒时,额叶电极处的注意效应比ISI为400毫秒时更大。对照ERP和未注意ERP的N140波幅没有差异,这可能表明在对照条件下出现了小的加工负波(PN),或者它们之间的警觉水平存在差异。总之,N1(N140)的早期外侧(“颞叶”)和晚期中线(“额叶”)成分表现出不同的行为,因此可能具有不同的功能意义。在较长ISI条件下额叶电极处注意效应的增强支持了这样一种假设,即它与注意痕迹更强的、自愿性的维持有关。