Suppr超能文献

CT最佳刺激调节体感加工。

CT-Optimal Stimulation Modulates Somatosensory Processing.

作者信息

Ribeiro-Carreira A, da-Silva Márcia, Pereira Ana Rita, Carrillo-de-la-Peña Maria Teresa, Coutinho Joana, Sampaio Adriana, González-Villar Alberto J

机构信息

Psychological Neuroscience Laboratory (PNL), Research Center in Psychology (CIPsi), School of Psychology, Universidade do Minho, Braga, Portugal.

Brain and Pain (BaP) Lab, Departamento de Psicoloxía Clínica y Psicobioloxía, Facultade de Psicoloxía, Universidade de Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.

出版信息

Psychophysiology. 2025 Sep;62(9):e70146. doi: 10.1111/psyp.70146.

Abstract

Touch has an affective dimension, conveyed through low-threshold mechanoreceptors known as C-tactile (CT) afferents, which are activated by gentle, caress-like contact. While there is evidence that these fibers modulate nociceptive input, their influence on the processing of other somatosensory afferent activity remains largely unknown. In this study, we explored how slow brushing (CT-optimal stimulation) modulates somatosensory evoked potentials (SEPs) elicited by electrical stimulation of the median nerve (occurring at 0.7 to 3.7 s after stimulus onset), compared to vibration (at 200 Hz) and no touch, in 30 healthy participants. CT-targeted stimulation was delivered using a robotic arm developed in-house equipped with a cosmetic brush, which applied slow brushing movements at CT-optimal speeds (~3 cm/s) over the dorsal forearm. Vibrotactile stimulation, targeting A-beta fibers, was delivered using vibration motors adjacent to the brushed area, with intensity calibrated to match the perceived strength of brushing. SEPs were recorded under these three conditions. Our results showed no differences between slow brushing, vibration, and no touch conditions in the amplitude of early SEPs recorded over the somatosensory cortex (N20, P25, N30, and P45), which may indicate that CT stimulation does not affect early cortical processing of somatosensory information. However, a reduced frontocentral P150 SEP component was observed during slow brushing compared to the other conditions. This finding suggests that CT stimulation may reduce somatosensory input transmitted through the lemniscal system, possibly engaging brain areas involved in attentional and cognitive processing.

摘要

触觉具有情感维度,通过一种称为C触觉(CT)传入纤维的低阈值机械感受器来传递,这种感受器会被轻柔的、类似爱抚的接触所激活。虽然有证据表明这些纤维会调节伤害性输入,但其对其他躯体感觉传入活动处理过程的影响在很大程度上仍不为人知。在本研究中,我们探究了与振动(200赫兹)和无触摸相比,慢刷(CT最佳刺激)如何调节由正中神经电刺激诱发的体感诱发电位(SEP)(在刺激开始后0.7至3.7秒出现),研究对象为30名健康参与者。使用内部研发的配备化妆刷的机械臂进行CT靶向刺激,该机械臂以前臂背侧CT最佳速度(约3厘米/秒)进行慢刷动作。针对A-β纤维的振动触觉刺激通过靠近刷动区域的振动电机进行,强度经过校准以匹配刷动的感知强度。在这三种条件下记录SEP。我们的结果显示,在体感皮层记录的早期SEP(N20、P25、N30和P45)的幅度在慢刷、振动和无触摸条件之间没有差异,这可能表明CT刺激不影响体感信息的早期皮层处理。然而,与其他条件相比,在慢刷过程中观察到额中央P150 SEP成分减小。这一发现表明,CT刺激可能会减少通过薄束系统传递的体感输入,可能涉及参与注意力和认知处理的脑区。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4e8f/12415938/df7fc8929208/PSYP-62-e70146-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验