Moreau Karen, Faure Claudine, Violot Sébastien, Gouet Patrice, Verdier Gérard, Ronfort Corinne
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique, Université Claude Bernard, Lyon, France.
Virology. 2004 Jan 20;318(2):566-81. doi: 10.1016/j.virol.2003.09.037.
During replicative cycle of retroviruses, the reverse-transcribed viral DNA is integrated into the cell DNA by the viral integrase (IN) enzyme. The central core domain of IN contains the catalytic site of the enzyme and is involved in binding viral ends and cell DNA as well as dimerization. We previously performed single amino acid substitutions in the core domain of an Avian Leukemia and Sarcoma Virus (ALSV) IN [Arch. Virol. 147 (2002) 1761]. Here, we modeled the resulting IN mutants and analyzed the ability of these mutants to mediate concerted DNA integration in an in vitro assay, and to form dimers by protein-protein cross-linking and size exclusion chromatography. The N197C mutation resulted in the inability of the mutant to perform concerted integration that was concomitant with a loss of IN dimerization. Surprisingly, mutations Q102G and A106V at the dimer interface resulted in mutants with higher efficiencies than the wild-type IN in performing two-ended concerted integration of viral DNA ends. The G139D and A195V mutants had a trend to perform one-ended DNA integration of viral ends instead of two-ended integration. More drastically, the I88L and L135G mutants preferentially mediated nonconcerted DNA integration although the proteins form dimers. Therefore, these mutations may alter the formation of IN complexes of higher molecular size than a dimer that would be required for concerted integration. This study points to the important role of core domain residues in the concerted integration of viral DNA ends as well as in the oligomerization of the enzyme.
在逆转录病毒的复制周期中,逆转录产生的病毒DNA通过病毒整合酶(IN)整合到细胞DNA中。IN的中央核心结构域包含该酶的催化位点,参与结合病毒末端和细胞DNA以及二聚化。我们之前在禽白血病和肉瘤病毒(ALSV)IN的核心结构域中进行了单个氨基酸替换[《病毒学档案》147(2002)1761]。在此,我们对产生的IN突变体进行建模,并在体外试验中分析这些突变体介导协同DNA整合的能力,以及通过蛋白质-蛋白质交联和尺寸排阻色谱法形成二聚体的能力。N197C突变导致突变体无法进行协同整合,同时伴随着IN二聚化的丧失。令人惊讶的是,二聚体界面处的Q102G和A106V突变导致突变体在进行病毒DNA末端的两端协同整合时比野生型IN具有更高的效率。G139D和A195V突变体倾向于进行病毒末端的单端DNA整合而非两端整合。更显著的是,I88L和L135G突变体优先介导非协同DNA整合,尽管这些蛋白质能形成二聚体。因此,这些突变可能会改变比协同整合所需的二聚体更大分子尺寸的IN复合物的形成。这项研究指出了核心结构域残基在病毒DNA末端的协同整合以及酶的寡聚化中的重要作用。