Johnstone Kristy A, Page Andrew C
School of Psychology, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, WA 6009, Australia.
Behav Res Ther. 2004 Mar;42(3):249-75. doi: 10.1016/S0005-7967(03)00137-2.
To replicate and extend the finding that distraction facilitates between session anxiety reduction (), 27 spider phobics underwent three 10-min sessions of in vivo exposure followed by one 10-min exposure session at a 4-week follow-up, while having either stimulus-relevant focused conversation or stimulus-irrelevant distracting conversation with the experimenter. Physiological arousal and subjective anxiety were measured during exposure, and self-efficacy, perceived control and performance on a behavioural task were measured at pre-treatment, post session-3, and follow-up. Monitoring and blunting coping styles were also measured at pre-treatment to assess their impact on treatment outcome. Despite equal physiological activation between the groups, those who underwent distracted exposure showed greater reductions in subjective fear within and between sessions, and showed greater increases in self-efficacy ratings, internal perceived control and performance on a behavioural task. Coping style did not interact with the effect of distraction or focusing during exposure, however blunters had less subjective anxiety reduction overall, particularly when they underwent focused exposure. Results are discussed in terms of the emotional processing model and self-efficacy theory.
为了复制并拓展分心有助于降低疗程间焦虑这一发现(),27名蜘蛛恐惧症患者接受了三次10分钟的现场暴露治疗,随后在4周随访时又进行了一次10分钟的暴露治疗,期间他们与实验者进行了与刺激相关的专注对话或与刺激无关的分心对话。在暴露期间测量生理唤醒和主观焦虑,在治疗前、第三疗程后和随访时测量自我效能感、感知控制和行为任务表现。在治疗前还测量了监测和钝化应对方式,以评估它们对治疗结果的影响。尽管两组之间生理激活程度相同,但接受分心暴露的患者在疗程内和疗程间主观恐惧的降低幅度更大,自我效能感评分、内部感知控制和行为任务表现的提高幅度也更大。应对方式在暴露期间与分心或专注的效果没有相互作用,然而,钝化应对者总体上主观焦虑降低较少,尤其是在接受专注暴露时。根据情绪加工模型和自我效能理论对结果进行了讨论。