Farabegoli Fulvia, Hermsen Mario A J A, Ceccarelli Claudio, Santini Donatella, Weiss Marianne M, Meijer Gerrit A, van Diest Paul J
Department of Experimental Pathology, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy.
Mod Pathol. 2004 Apr;17(4):449-55. doi: 10.1038/modpathol.3800059.
We applied comparative genomic hybridization (CGH) to 46 breast carcinoma samples, collected from 1993 to 1995, in order to detect chromosome 1q gains and 16q losses and to define whether samples showing both these alterations had distinct biopathologic features and different clinical outcome. A total of 22 samples (48%) had simultaneous chromosome 1q gain and 16q loss, which was always associated with other genetic changes. In total, 23 samples had various chromosome imbalances (including chromosome 1q gain independent of chromosome 16q loss and vice versa) and one sample did not show detectable alterations. Samples having chromosome 1q gain/16q loss were compared to the other samples with regard to neoplasm size, lymph-node status, histologic and nuclear grade, estrogen and progesterone receptor presence, Ki-67, pRB, Cyclin D1, Cyclin A, p53, p21 and p27 expression as detected by immunohistochemistry. The samples showing chromosome 1q gain/16q loss had high steroid hormone receptor expression (P=0.02), low cell growth fraction (Ki-67, P=0.03) and high p27 expression (P<0.001). No statistical correlation with disease-free survival and overall survival or response to hormonal therapy was found. We conclude that simultaneous chromosome 1q gain/16q loss is a frequent event in invasive breast cancer, which occurs in a subset of both intermediate- and high-grade breast carcinomas. Although the final chromosome 1q and 16q imbalances might have originated from different chromosome alterations in low- and high-grade samples, the gene-dosage effect might be important in conferring peculiar biopathologic characteristics to this subset of samples. The cytogenetic and molecular mechanisms underlying these chromosome changes deserve further investigations.
我们对1993年至1995年间收集的46例乳腺癌样本进行了比较基因组杂交(CGH),以检测1号染色体长臂增益和16号染色体长臂缺失,并确定同时出现这两种改变的样本是否具有独特的生物病理学特征和不同的临床结局。共有22个样本(48%)同时存在1号染色体长臂增益和16号染色体长臂缺失,且总是与其他基因变化相关。总共有23个样本存在各种染色体失衡(包括独立于16号染色体长臂缺失的1号染色体长臂增益及反之情况),1个样本未显示可检测到的改变。将存在1号染色体长臂增益/16号染色体长臂缺失的样本与其他样本在肿瘤大小、淋巴结状态、组织学和核分级、雌激素和孕激素受体表达情况、免疫组化检测的Ki-67、pRB、细胞周期蛋白D1、细胞周期蛋白A、p53、p21和p27表达方面进行了比较。显示1号染色体长臂增益/16号染色体长臂缺失的样本具有高类固醇激素受体表达(P = 0.02)、低细胞生长分数(Ki-67,P = 0.03)和高p27表达(P < 0.001)。未发现与无病生存期、总生存期或激素治疗反应存在统计学相关性。我们得出结论,同时发生的1号染色体长臂增益/16号染色体长臂缺失在浸润性乳腺癌中是常见事件,发生于中、高级别乳腺癌的一个亚组中。尽管最终的1号和16号染色体失衡可能源于低级别和高级别样本中不同的染色体改变,但基因剂量效应可能在赋予该亚组样本独特的生物病理学特征方面很重要。这些染色体变化背后的细胞遗传学和分子机制值得进一步研究。