Roylance R, Gorman P, Papior T, Wan Y-L, Ives M, Watson J E, Collins C, Wortham N, Langford C, Fiegler H, Carter N, Gillett C, Sasieni P, Pinder S, Hanby A, Tomlinson I
Molecular and Population Genetics Laboratory, Cancer Research UK, Lincoln's Inn Fields, London, UK.
Oncogene. 2006 Oct 19;25(49):6544-53. doi: 10.1038/sj.onc.1209659. Epub 2006 May 15.
We analysed chromosome 16q in 106 breast cancers using tiling-path array-comparative genomic hybridization (aCGH). About 80% of ductal cancers (IDCs) and all lobular cancers (ILCs) lost at least part of 16q. Grade I (GI) IDCs and ILCs often lost the whole chromosome arm. Grade II (GII) and grade III (GIII) IDCs showed less frequent whole-arm loss, but often had complex changes, typically small regions of gain together with larger regions of loss. The boundaries of gains/losses tended to cluster, common sites being 54.5-55.5 Mb and 57.4-58.8 Mb. Overall, the peak frequency of loss (83% cancers) occurred at 61.9-62.9 Mb. We also found several 'minimal' regions of loss/gain. However, no mutations in candidate genes (TRADD, CDH5, CDH8 and CDH11) were detected. Cluster analysis based on copy number changes identified a large group of cancers that had lost most of 16q, and two smaller groups (one with few changes, one with a tendency to show copy number gain). Although all morphological types occurred in each cluster group, IDCs (especially GII/GIII) were relatively overrepresented in the smaller groups. Cluster groups were not independently associated with survival. Use of tiling-path aCGH prompted re-evaluation of the hypothetical pathways of breast carcinogenesis. ILCs have the simplest changes on 16q and probably diverge from the IDC lineage close to the stage of 16q loss. Higher-grade IDCs probably develop from low-grade lesions in most cases, but there remains evidence that some GII/GIII IDCs arise without a GI precursor.
我们使用平铺路径阵列比较基因组杂交技术(aCGH)对106例乳腺癌的16号染色体长臂进行了分析。约80%的导管癌(IDC)和所有小叶癌(ILC)至少丢失了16号染色体长臂的一部分。I级(GI)IDC和ILC常整条染色体臂缺失。II级(GII)和III级(GIII)IDC整条臂缺失的频率较低,但常伴有复杂变化,典型表现为小区域的增益与大区域的缺失并存。增益/缺失的边界倾向于聚集,常见位点为54.5 - 55.5兆碱基对和57.4 - 58.8兆碱基对。总体而言,缺失的最高频率(83%的癌症)出现在61.9 - 62.9兆碱基对处。我们还发现了几个缺失/增益的“最小”区域。然而,未检测到候选基因(TRADD、CDH5、CDH8和CDH11)的突变。基于拷贝数变化的聚类分析确定了一大组丢失了大部分16号染色体长臂的癌症,以及两个较小的组(一组变化较少,一组有拷贝数增加的倾向)。尽管每种形态学类型都出现在每个聚类组中,但IDC(尤其是GII/GIII)在较小的组中相对占比过高。聚类组与生存率无独立相关性。平铺路径aCGH的应用促使对乳腺癌发生的假设途径进行重新评估。ILC在16号染色体长臂上的变化最为简单,可能在接近16号染色体长臂丢失阶段从IDC谱系分化而来。在大多数情况下,高级别IDC可能由低级别病变发展而来,但仍有证据表明一些GII/GIII IDC并非由GI前驱病变产生。