Da Col Uberto, Di Manici Gino, Di Bella Isidoro, Di Lazzaro Davide, Pasquino Stefano, Klersy Catherine, Affronti Alessandro, Ragni Temistocle
Divisione di Cardiochirurgia, Ospedale Silvestrini, Perugia.
Ital Heart J Suppl. 2003 Dec;4(12):973-7.
The increase in mean age has made older patients candidates to myocardial revascularization. This study is focused to evaluate hospital mortality and major postoperative complications in two groups of patients < or = 70 or > 70 years. The possible confounder effect of other important risk factors has been studied in multivariate models.
From January 1 to December 31, 2002, 228 patients < or = 70 years (group A) and 116 patients > 70 years (group B) underwent isolated myocardial revascularization. We analyzed the incidence of hospital mortality, cardiac failure, postoperative bleeding, major arrhythmias, atrial fibrillation, respiratory failure, renal failure, sternal infection, stroke, transient ischemic attack, total neurological complications, and number of patients with at least one of these complications. Univariate statistical analysis was used to compare this two groups and multivariate analysis to adjust for four known important risk factors, i.e. sex, diabetes, ejection fraction < 0.40, and off-pump surgical technique.
Hospital mortality was statistically higher in group B than in group A (7.8 vs 1.7%, p < 0.05). The incidence of cardiac failure, although higher in group B, was not statistically significant. Multivariate analysis confirmed low ejection fraction as the only statistical risk factor for low cardiac output (p < 0.05). Atrial fibrillation was statistically higher in group B (p < 0.05). No difference was found for all other complications considered. Age, low ejection fraction and the use of cardiocirculatory bypass at multivariate analysis were statistically significant risk factors for the incidence of at least one postoperative event.
Myocardial revascularization in patients > 70 years has a higher mortality and morbidity. At multivariate analysis, low ejection fraction is also confirmed as a significant risk factor for low cardiac output and total morbidity. At the same time, the technical option of "beating heart" myocardial revascularization seems to achieve better results and probably it should be used more extensively in this group of patients.
平均年龄的增加使老年患者成为心肌血运重建的候选对象。本研究旨在评估两组年龄≤70岁或>70岁患者的医院死亡率及主要术后并发症。在多变量模型中研究了其他重要危险因素可能的混杂效应。
2002年1月1日至12月31日,228例年龄≤70岁的患者(A组)和116例年龄>70岁的患者(B组)接受了单纯心肌血运重建术。我们分析了医院死亡率、心力衰竭、术后出血、严重心律失常、心房颤动、呼吸衰竭、肾衰竭、胸骨感染、中风、短暂性脑缺血发作、总的神经并发症的发生率,以及至少发生其中一种并发症的患者数量。采用单变量统计分析比较这两组,多变量分析用于校正四个已知的重要危险因素,即性别、糖尿病、射血分数<0.40和非体外循环手术技术。
B组的医院死亡率在统计学上高于A组(7.8%对1.7%,p<0.05)。心力衰竭的发生率虽然在B组较高,但无统计学意义。多变量分析证实低射血分数是低心输出量的唯一统计学危险因素(p<0.05)。B组心房颤动的发生率在统计学上较高(p<0.05)。在考虑的所有其他并发症方面未发现差异。在多变量分析中,年龄、低射血分数和使用体外循环是至少发生一种术后事件发生率的统计学显著危险因素。
70岁以上患者的心肌血运重建术死亡率和发病率更高。在多变量分析中,低射血分数也被确认为低心输出量和总发病率的显著危险因素。同时,“心脏不停跳”心肌血运重建术的技术选择似乎能取得更好的效果,可能应在这组患者中更广泛地应用。