Suppr超能文献

体外循环期间的多普勒微栓塞信号:两种膜式氧合器的比较

Doppler microembolic signals during cardiopulmonary bypass: comparison of two membrane oxygenators.

作者信息

Georgiadis Dimitrios, Stets Rüdiger, Schorch Alexander, Baumgartner Ralf W, Bernet Franziska, Zerkowski Hans-Reinhard

机构信息

Department of Neurology, Martin-Luther University of Halle-Wittenberg, Halle/Saale, Germany.

出版信息

Neurol Res. 2004 Jan;26(1):99-102. doi: 10.1179/016164104773026615.

Abstract

We undertook this study to evaluate the dependence of Doppler microembolic signal (MES) counts, detected during cardiopulmonary bypass, on the type of oxygenator used. A total of 90 patients, 71 men and 19 women, aged 60 +/- 10 years (mean +/- SD), undergoing elective cardiac surgery for coronary artery bypass grafting (one vessel, n = 6; two vessels, n = 24; three vessels, n = 33; four vessels, n = 9) or valve replacement (mitral valve, n = 2, aortic valve, n = 15, both valves, n = 1) were monitored with transcranial Doppler sonography during the complete surgical procedure. The surgical and anesthetic techniques were standardized in all patients, except for the type of membrane oxygenator used (COBE CML Duo, n = 55 or DIDECO D 703, n = 35). MES count was expressed as total number of MES detected in both middle cerebral arteries during cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and also as total MES number divided by the CPB duration in minutes (MES min(-1)). No significant differences in patients' age or sex and type and duration of operation were noted between the two groups. MES incidence while the patients were on cardiopulmonary bypass was 100%. MES counts during CPB were 309 (236-502) and 143 (86-233) for DIDECO and COBE oxygenators, respectively (p < 0.00001). MES min(-1) were also significantly higher in patients operated with DIDECO, as compared to COBE oxygenators (3.7 (2.4-5.6) versus 1.5 (1-2.4), respectively, p < 0.0001). Inter-observer variability was satisfactory (k = 0.72). Use of a DIDECO D 703 oxygenator resulted in significantly higher MES counts as compared to the COBE CML Duo oxygenator. The clinical relevance of this finding remains to be determined.

摘要

我们开展这项研究,以评估在体外循环期间检测到的多普勒微栓塞信号(MES)计数与所使用的氧合器类型之间的相关性。共有90例患者,其中男性71例,女性19例,年龄60±10岁(均值±标准差),接受择期心脏手术,包括冠状动脉搭桥术(单支血管,n = 6;两支血管,n = 24;三支血管,n = 33;四支血管,n = 9)或瓣膜置换术(二尖瓣,n = 2;主动脉瓣,n = 15;双瓣膜,n = 1),在整个手术过程中采用经颅多普勒超声进行监测。除了所使用的膜式氧合器类型(COBE CML Duo,n = 55或DIDECO D 703,n = 35)外,所有患者的手术和麻醉技术均标准化。MES计数表示为体外循环(CPB)期间在双侧大脑中动脉检测到的MES总数,也表示为MES总数除以CPB持续时间(分钟)(MES min⁻¹)。两组患者在年龄、性别、手术类型和持续时间方面未发现显著差异。患者在体外循环期间MES发生率为100%。对于DIDECO和COBE氧合器,CPB期间的MES计数分别为309(236 - 502)和143(86 - 233)(p < 0.00001)。与使用COBE氧合器的患者相比,使用DIDECO氧合器的患者的MES min⁻¹也显著更高(分别为3.7(2.4 - 5.6)和1.5(1 - 2.4),p < 0.0001)。观察者间变异性良好(k = 0.72)。与COBE CML Duo氧合器相比,使用DIDECO D 703氧合器导致MES计数显著更高。这一发现的临床相关性仍有待确定。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验