• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

庸医与欺诈:理解伦理问题并做出回应。

Quackery and fraud: understanding the ethical issues and responding.

作者信息

Chambers David W

机构信息

School of Dentistry, University of the Pacific, USA.

出版信息

J Am Coll Dent. 2003;70(3):9-17.

PMID:14977372
Abstract

A small number of dentists abuse their patients and the public trust in the profession by practicing quackery or fraudulent or questionable dentistry. Such practitioners can be classified as incompetent, as treating their patients as a means to personal fulfillment, as operating beyond their legal qualifications, or as being quacks, charlatans, or frauds. Ethical practice requires all five of these characteristics: informed consent, high benefit to risk ratio, competence, professional integrity, and reasoned scientific basis for care. Quacks and frauds place their own interests and judgment above those of their patients and the profession. Ethical dentists have obligations to act to protect their patients and the profession in their relationships with patients and with colleagues, as a profession in dealing with the public, and as a research community.

摘要

少数牙医通过庸医行为、欺诈性或有问题的牙科治疗来虐待患者并辜负公众对该行业的信任。这类从业者可被归类为不称职,将患者当作实现个人满足的手段,超出其法定资质行医,或是庸医、江湖骗子或欺诈者。道德行医需要具备以下五个特征:知情同意、高收益风险比、能力、职业操守以及合理的科学护理依据。庸医和欺诈者将自身利益和判断置于患者及行业利益之上。有道德的牙医有义务在与患者及同事的关系中、作为一个行业与公众打交道时以及作为一个研究群体时,采取行动保护患者和行业。

相似文献

1
Quackery and fraud: understanding the ethical issues and responding.庸医与欺诈:理解伦理问题并做出回应。
J Am Coll Dent. 2003;70(3):9-17.
2
The ethics of quackery and fraud in dentistry: a position paper.牙科领域庸医行为与欺诈行为的伦理问题:一篇立场文件。
J Am Coll Dent. 2003;70(3):6-8.
3
Betrayal of trust: reflections on questionable dental practices.信任的背叛:对可疑牙科诊疗行为的反思
J Am Coll Dent. 2003;70(3):26-8.
4
The role of professional journalism in protecting against questionable practice.专业新闻报道在防范可疑行为方面的作用。
J Am Coll Dent. 2003;70(3):29-33.
5
New technologies in health care. Part 1: A moral and ethical predicament.医疗保健中的新技术。第1部分:道德与伦理困境。
J Can Dent Assoc. 2008 Sep;74(7):631-5.
6
Taking a stand against fraud and quackery in dentistry.坚决抵制牙科领域的欺诈和庸医行为。
J Am Coll Dent. 2003;70(3):4-5.
7
Ethical advertising in dentistry.牙科领域的道德广告。
J Am Coll Dent. 2009 Spring;76(1):44-9.
8
New technologies: quackery or fraud?新技术:江湖医术还是欺诈行为?
Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2005 Mar;26(3):210, 212, 214 passim.
9
Quackery, fraud, and denturists.庸医、欺诈与假牙技师。
J Am Coll Dent. 2003;70(3):34-7.
10
Practitioners enrolling their patients in clinical research.让患者参与临床研究的从业者。
SADJ. 2013 Apr;68(3):135-7.

引用本文的文献

1
Quackery: a major loophole in dental practice in India.庸医行为:印度牙科医疗实践中的一个重大漏洞。
J Clin Diagn Res. 2014 Feb;8(2):283. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2014/6820.4081. Epub 2014 Feb 3.