• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一项针对学龄儿童情感障碍和精神分裂症儿童版的儿童躁狂评定量表的初步研究。

A preliminary study of the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children mania rating scale for children and adolescents.

作者信息

Axelson David, Birmaher Boris J, Brent David, Wassick Susan, Hoover Christine, Bridge Jeffrey, Ryan Neal

机构信息

Division of Child Psychiatry, Western Psychiatric Institute and Clinic, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania 15213, USA.

出版信息

J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2003 Winter;13(4):463-70. doi: 10.1089/104454603322724850.

DOI:10.1089/104454603322724850
PMID:14977459
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To construct a mania rating scale designed for children and adolescents.

METHODS

Fourteen questions from the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present Episode (K-SADS-P) 1986 version plus a new item assessing mood lability were used to construct a clinician-rated mania rating scale (K-SADS-MRS). Interrater reliability was determined prospectively with 22 patients from a bipolar outpatient clinic. Sensitivity to treatment effects was determined in a separate cohort of 23 patients.

RESULTS

Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.94) and interrater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient = 0.97 between two raters) were high. Convergent validity with the Clinical Global Impressions-Severity scale (bipolar version) was good (r(s)= 0.91, p < 0.001). Treatment responders had significantly greater reduction in K-SADS-MRS scores than nonresponders (-15.6 +/- 8.7 vs. 0.3 +/- 8.8), t(21) = 4.2, p < 0.001. The K-SADS-MRS scores differentiated bipolar patients who had clinically significant manic symptoms from those who did not, with a sensitivity of 87% and a specificity of 81%.

CONCLUSION

The K-SADS-MRS shows promise as a rating scale for measuring manic symptom severity in pediatric bipolar patients.

摘要

目的

构建一个针对儿童和青少年的躁狂评定量表。

方法

采用《学龄儿童情感障碍和精神分裂症量表(当前发作)》(K-SADS-P)1986版中的14个问题,外加一个评估情绪不稳定的新项目,构建一个临床医生评定的躁狂评定量表(K-SADS-MRS)。对来自双相情感障碍门诊的22名患者进行前瞻性评估者间信度测定。在另一组23名患者中测定对治疗效果的敏感性。

结果

内部一致性(克朗巴哈系数=0.94)和评估者间信度(两名评估者间的组内相关系数=0.97)较高。与临床总体印象严重程度量表(双相情感障碍版)的收敛效度良好(r(s)=0.91,p<0.001)。治疗有反应者的K-SADS-MRS评分下降幅度显著大于无反应者(-15.6±8.7对0.3±8.8),t(21)=4.2,p<0.001。K-SADS-MRS评分能够区分有临床显著躁狂症状的双相情感障碍患者和无此症状的患者,敏感性为87%,特异性为81%。

结论

K-SADS-MRS有望作为测量儿童双相情感障碍患者躁狂症状严重程度的评定量表。

相似文献

1
A preliminary study of the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children mania rating scale for children and adolescents.一项针对学龄儿童情感障碍和精神分裂症儿童版的儿童躁狂评定量表的初步研究。
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2003 Winter;13(4):463-70. doi: 10.1089/104454603322724850.
2
Frequency of manic symptoms and bipolar disorder in psychiatrically hospitalized adolescents using the K-SADS Mania Rating Scale.
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2005 Dec;15(6):918-30. doi: 10.1089/cap.2005.15.918.
3
The reliability and validity of Kiddie-Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia-Present and Lifetime Version- Korean version (K-SADS-PL-K).儿童情感障碍和精神分裂症量表-目前及终生版-韩语版(K-SADS-PL-K)的信度和效度。
Yonsei Med J. 2004 Feb 29;45(1):81-9. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2004.45.1.81.
4
Reliability and validity of the Chinese version of the kiddie-schedule for affective disorders and schizophrenia-present and lifetime version DSM-5 (K-SADS-PL-C DSM-5).中文版本的儿童情感障碍和精神分裂症谱系及诊断与统计手册-5 现行版(K-SADS-PL-C DSM-5)的可靠性和有效性。
J Affect Disord. 2022 Nov 15;317:72-78. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.08.062. Epub 2022 Aug 25.
5
Construct validity and parent-child agreement of the six new or modified disorders included in the Spanish version of the Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia present and Lifetime Version DSM-5 (K-SADS-PL-5).西班牙版《儿童心境障碍和精神分裂症诊断与统计手册-5 版现患和 Lifetime 版定式访谈》(K-SADS-PL-5)中新增或修订的 6 种障碍的构念效度和父母-子女一致性。
J Psychiatr Res. 2018 Jun;101:28-33. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.02.029. Epub 2018 Mar 1.
6
[Interrater reliability of the Spanish version of Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children--Present and Lifetime version (K-SADS-PL)].[《学龄儿童情感障碍和精神分裂症问卷(目前和终生版)》西班牙语版的评分者间信度(K-SADS-PL)]
Actas Esp Psiquiatr. 2006 Jan-Feb;34(1):36-40.
7
Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL): initial reliability and validity data.学龄儿童情感障碍和精神分裂症量表-目前和终生版(K-SADS-PL):初始信度和效度数据。
J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 1997 Jul;36(7):980-8. doi: 10.1097/00004583-199707000-00021.
8
Evaluation and comparison of psychometric instruments for pediatric bipolar spectrum disorders in four age groups.四个年龄组中用于儿童双相谱系障碍的心理测量工具的评估与比较
J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol. 2007 Dec;17(6):853-66. doi: 10.1089/cap.2007.0057.
9
Predictive validity of the K-SADS-PL 2009 version in school-aged and adolescent outpatients.2009年版K-SADS-PL在学龄期及青少年门诊患者中的预测效度。
Nord J Psychiatry. 2017 May;71(4):270-276. doi: 10.1080/08039488.2016.1276622. Epub 2017 Feb 20.
10
[Reliability and Validity of the Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia for School-Age Children-Present and Lifetime Version, DSM-5 November 2016-Turkish Adaptation (K-SADS-PL-DSM-5-T)].《学龄儿童情感障碍和精神分裂症量表(目前及终生版),DSM - 5(2016年11月) - 土耳其语改编版(K - SADS - PL - DSM - 5 - T)》的信效度
Turk Psikiyatri Derg. 2019 Spring;30(1):42-50.

引用本文的文献

1
Association of grey matter cerebral blood flow with white matter integrity in relation to youth bipolar disorder.青年双相情感障碍患者灰质脑血流量与白质完整性的关联
J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2025 Jul 25;50(4):E210-E217. doi: 10.1503/jpn.250019. Print 2025 Jul-Aug.
2
Design and feasibility of smartphone-based digital phenotyping for long-term mental health monitoring in adolescents.基于智能手机的数字表型分析用于青少年长期心理健康监测的设计与可行性
PLOS Digit Health. 2025 Jul 1;4(7):e0000883. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000883. eCollection 2025 Jul.
3
Cerebral Blood Flow and Mood in Adolescents With Bipolar Disorder.
双相情感障碍青少年的脑血流量与情绪
JAACAP Open. 2024 Mar 13;3(2):205-215. doi: 10.1016/j.jaacop.2024.01.011. eCollection 2025 Jun.
4
Sex differences in pediatric major depressive episodes: a cross-sectional study on psychiatric symptoms in early-onset mood disorders.儿童重度抑郁发作中的性别差异:早发性情绪障碍精神症状的横断面研究
Front Psychiatry. 2025 Apr 25;16:1503794. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2025.1503794. eCollection 2025.
5
Error monitoring and response inhibition in adolescents with bipolar disorders: An ERP study.双相情感障碍青少年的错误监测与反应抑制:一项事件相关电位研究。
Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. 2024 Dec 19. doi: 10.3758/s13415-024-01253-1.
6
Youth Generalized Anxiety and Brain Activation States During Socioemotional Processing.青少年社交情绪加工过程中的广泛性焦虑与大脑激活状态
JAMA Psychiatry. 2025 Mar 1;82(3):264-273. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2024.4105.
7
Depression severity and verbal comprehension in children and adolescents with a major depressive episode.患有重度抑郁发作的儿童和青少年的抑郁严重程度与语言理解能力
Front Psychiatry. 2024 Sep 24;15:1395391. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2024.1395391. eCollection 2024.
8
Examining Factors Associated With Medication Adherence in Youth With Bipolar Disorder.探究双相情感障碍青少年药物依从性的相关因素。
JAACAP Open. 2023 Sep;1(2):105-115. doi: 10.1016/j.jaacop.2023.06.001. Epub 2023 Jun 15.
9
Pilot study of circulating cell-free mitochondrial DNA in relation to brain structure in youth bipolar disorder.青年双相情感障碍患者循环游离线粒体DNA与脑结构关系的初步研究。
Int J Bipolar Disord. 2024 Jun 14;12(1):21. doi: 10.1186/s40345-024-00334-x.
10
Childhood Clinical Features Preceding the Onset of Bipolar Versus Major Depressive Disorders During Adolescence.青少年期双相情感障碍与重度抑郁症发作前的儿童期临床特征。
J Atten Disord. 2024 Mar;28(5):648-663. doi: 10.1177/10870547231225819. Epub 2024 Feb 7.