Sugarman S M, Perez-Soler R
Department of Medicine, University of Texas, M.D., Anderson Cancer Center, Houston 77030.
Crit Rev Oncol Hematol. 1992;12(3):231-42. doi: 10.1016/1040-8428(92)90056-v.
Technological advances in liposomal preparation and efficient drug entrapment, along with supportive preclinical studies, have led to a number of recent clinical trials utilizing liposomes as drug carriers in the treatment of human malignancy. Although the results of these trials must be considered preliminary, it is clear that liposomal delivery of chemotherapeutic agents is safe at the doses administered. Aside from minor constitutional symptoms, virtually all toxicity could be attributed to release of the incorporated drug. Myelosuppression tends to be the dose-limiting toxicity with free drug, whereas constitutional symptoms are more likely to occur with encapsulated biologic therapy. Prior to human trials, there was fear that intravenous injection of liposomes could result in pulmonary emboli. No cases of pulmonary embolism secondary to liposome therapy have been recorded. The objective response rate in the patients studied appears to be minimal. This is not surprising, since the overwhelming majority of patients studied had disease that was advanced and previously shown to be refractory to therapy. Subgroups of patients that appear to benefit most include those with breast cancer who were treated with liposomal doxorubicin and those with advanced melanoma treated with liposomal tumor vaccines. Additional phase II and III clinical trials will better define the effectiveness of treatment modalities incorporating liposomes. VI-A. Future directions One of the earliest applications of liposomes may be in the amelioration of drug toxicity. Although not yet proven, the clinical studies reviewed suggest that liposomal delivery of doxorubicin reduces cardiotoxicity without sacrificing antitumor effect. Although similar claims have been made in support of continuous infusion doxorubicin [11], one can avoid unnecessary hospitalization or the bulk and expense of portable infusion devices by a single administration of the liposomal preparation. Liposome encapsulation can markedly alter the biodistribution and pharmacokinetics of well-known chemotherapeutic agents. The effectiveness of liposomal drug delivery in human trials thus far has probably been more closely related to altered pharmacokinetics rather than enhanced drug delivery to tumor or increased tumor responsiveness. As demonstrated by Gabizon [19], increased liposome circulating time in the murine model can be achieved by using small unilamellar vesicles containing a phosphatidylcholine of high phase-transition temperature and a small molar fraction of monosialoganglioside or hydrogenated phosphatidylinositol.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)
脂质体制备技术的进步以及高效的药物包封技术,再加上支持性的临床前研究,使得近期开展了多项利用脂质体作为药物载体治疗人类恶性肿瘤的临床试验。尽管这些试验结果必须视为初步结果,但显然在给药剂量下,脂质体递送化疗药物是安全的。除了轻微的全身性症状外,几乎所有毒性都可归因于包封药物的释放。骨髓抑制往往是游离药物的剂量限制性毒性,而全身性症状更可能发生在包封生物疗法中。在人体试验之前,人们担心静脉注射脂质体可能导致肺栓塞。尚未记录到脂质体治疗继发肺栓塞的病例。所研究患者的客观缓解率似乎很低。这并不奇怪,因为绝大多数研究患者的疾病已处于晚期且先前已显示对治疗耐药。似乎受益最大的患者亚组包括接受脂质体阿霉素治疗的乳腺癌患者和接受脂质体肿瘤疫苗治疗的晚期黑色素瘤患者。更多的II期和III期临床试验将更好地确定包含脂质体的治疗方式的有效性。VI - A. 未来方向脂质体最早的应用之一可能是改善药物毒性。尽管尚未得到证实,但所综述的临床研究表明,脂质体递送阿霉素可降低心脏毒性而不牺牲抗肿瘤效果。尽管也有类似的说法支持持续输注阿霉素[11],但通过单次给药脂质体制剂,可避免不必要的住院治疗或便携式输注设备的体积和费用。脂质体包封可显著改变知名化疗药物的生物分布和药代动力学。迄今为止,脂质体药物递送在人体试验中的有效性可能更多地与药代动力学改变有关,而不是与增强药物向肿瘤的递送或增加肿瘤反应性有关。正如加比松[19]所证明的,通过使用含有高相变温度的磷脂酰胆碱和少量单唾液酸神经节苷脂或氢化磷脂酰肌醇的小单层囊泡,可在小鼠模型中延长脂质体循环时间。(摘要截取自400字)