Nicholas Johann C B
Renal Dialysis Unit, New Cross Hospital, Wolverhampton, UK.
Drugs Aging. 2004;21(3):187-201. doi: 10.2165/00002512-200421030-00004.
Anaemia correction in patients with end-stage renal disease has been enhanced following the use of epoetin alfa or beta and there are a number of studies detailing its application. Dialysis centres are dealing with greater numbers of elderly patients and anaemia correction in these individuals may differ by virtue of co-existing comorbidity and their age.
The aim of this study was to examine the response of the elderly patients to anaemia correction using a locally devised anaemia correction protocol while receiving dialysis.
An incident, non-randomised, cohort observational study in a single centre was used to compare the correction of anaemia in a population of elderly (> or =65 years of age) and young dialysis patients. All incident patients starting peritoneal dialysis and haemodialysis (HD) between January 1998 and December 2000 were selected and treated using a locally devised anaemia correction protocol and observed for at least 1 year. Anaemia correction following adjustments for factors such as age, comorbidity, dialysis type, dialysis access type and predialysis nephrological care was assessed.
198 patients commenced dialysis with 86 elderly patients (mean age +/- SD 73.7 +/- 4.9 years). The elderly patients had similar periods of predialysis nephrological care as the younger patients. Most patients received HD and required a tunnelled dialysis catheter (TC) as vascular access. Equivalent numbers of elderly patients received peritoneal dialysis. Comorbid scores were greater in the elderly and patient survival was dependent upon these comorbid factors. Following the strict use of TCs, patient survival was similar to those patients commencing HD with arterio-venous fistulae. Anaemia correction in the elderly was similar to the younger patients, with a median haemoglobin of 11.3 g/dL. By 6 months of dialysis, most patients achieved the UK Renal Association anaemia correction standard (haemoglobin above 10 g/dL). The elderly patients maintained significantly higher serum ferritin levels throughout (median 209 microg/L) and required less epoetin alfa or beta (median 91.6 units/kg/wk), indicating that functional iron deficiency in the elderly dialysis patients is less. Intravenous iron sucrose doses were similar in both age groups and iron overload (serum ferritin above 800 microg/L) had been avoided following the use of the intravenous iron protocol.
The study has noted that elderly patients responded to anaemia corrective therapies as well as the younger patients, despite greater levels of comorbidity while requiring less epoetin alfa or beta.
使用促红细胞生成素α或β后,终末期肾病患者的贫血纠正情况有所改善,并且有多项研究详细阐述了其应用。透析中心正在处理越来越多的老年患者,这些个体的贫血纠正情况可能因并存的合并症及其年龄而有所不同。
本研究的目的是在接受透析的同时,使用当地制定的贫血纠正方案来检查老年患者对贫血纠正的反应。
在单一中心进行一项前瞻性、非随机、队列观察性研究,以比较老年(≥65岁)和年轻透析患者群体中的贫血纠正情况。选择1998年1月至2000年12月期间开始腹膜透析和血液透析(HD)的所有新发病例患者,并使用当地制定的贫血纠正方案进行治疗,观察至少1年。评估在调整年龄、合并症、透析类型、透析通路类型和透析前肾脏护理等因素后的贫血纠正情况。
198例患者开始透析,其中86例为老年患者(平均年龄±标准差73.7±4.9岁)。老年患者透析前肾脏护理的时间与年轻患者相似。大多数患者接受HD治疗,需要带隧道的透析导管(TC)作为血管通路。接受腹膜透析的老年患者数量相当。老年患者的合并症评分更高,患者生存率取决于这些合并症因素。严格使用TC后,患者生存率与开始使用动静脉内瘘进行HD治疗的患者相似。老年患者的贫血纠正情况与年轻患者相似,血红蛋白中位数为11.3g/dL。到透析6个月时,大多数患者达到了英国肾脏协会的贫血纠正标准(血红蛋白高于10g/dL)。老年患者血清铁蛋白水平在整个过程中显著更高(中位数209μg/L),所需促红细胞生成素α或β更少(中位数91.6单位/kg/周),这表明老年透析患者的功能性缺铁情况较少。两个年龄组静脉注射蔗糖铁的剂量相似,并且在使用静脉铁方案后避免了铁过载(血清铁蛋白高于800μg/L)。
该研究指出,尽管老年患者合并症水平更高,但所需促红细胞生成素α或β更少,他们对贫血纠正治疗的反应与年轻患者一样好。