Suppr超能文献

安慰剂效应:化解期望与条件作用之争

The placebo effect: dissolving the expectancy versus conditioning debate.

作者信息

Stewart-Williams Steve, Podd John

机构信息

School of Psychology, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.

出版信息

Psychol Bull. 2004 Mar;130(2):324-40. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.130.2.324.

Abstract

The authors review the literature on the 2 main models of the placebo effect: expectancy theory and classical conditioning. A path is suggested to dissolving the theoretical impasse that has long plagued this issue. The key is to make a clear distinction between 2 questions: What factors shape placebo effects? and What learning mediates the placebo effect? The reviewed literature suggests that classical conditioning procedures are one shaping factor but that verbal information can also shape placebo effects. The literature also suggests that conditioning procedures and other sources of information sometimes shape conscious expectancies and that these expectancies mediate some placebo effects; however, in other cases conditioning procedures appear to shape placebo effects that are not mediated by conscious cognition.

摘要

作者回顾了关于安慰剂效应的两种主要模型的文献

期望理论和经典条件作用。文中提出了一条路径来化解长期困扰这一问题的理论僵局。关键在于明确区分两个问题:哪些因素塑造了安慰剂效应?以及何种学习过程介导了安慰剂效应?所回顾的文献表明,经典条件作用程序是一个塑造因素,但言语信息也能塑造安慰剂效应。文献还表明,条件作用程序和其他信息来源有时会塑造有意识的期望,并且这些期望介导了一些安慰剂效应;然而,在其他情况下,条件作用程序似乎塑造了并非由有意识认知介导的安慰剂效应。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验