Bornstein Robert F, Geiselman Kimberly J, Gallagher Heather A, Ng H Mei, Hughes Erin E, Languirand Mary A
Department of Psychology, Gettysburg College, PA 17325, USA.
J Pers Assess. 2004 Feb;82(1):104-13. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8201_15.
Research supports the construct validity of the Relationship Profile Test (RPT; Bornstein & Languirand, 2003), a 30-item, self-report measure of destructive overdependence (DO), dysfunctional detachment (DD), and healthy dependency. In this investigation, we assessed the relationships of gender, gender role, and gender role stereotype ratings to RPT subscale scores. In Study 1, we replicated earlier patterns of gender differences in RPT scores, assessed cross-sample consistency in gender difference effect sizes, and provided preliminary nonclinical norms for the RPT subscales. Study 2 showed that--as expected--DO items are perceived as stereotypically feminine, whereas DD items are perceived as stereotypically masculine. In Study 3, we examined the relationships of RPT subscale scores to masculinity, femininity, and androgyny scores. We discuss the theoretical, empirical, and clinical implications of these findings.
研究支持关系剖面图测试（RPT；博恩斯坦和朗吉兰德，2003年）的结构效度，这是一项包含30个条目的自我报告测量工具，用于测量破坏性过度依赖（DO）、功能失调性疏离（DD）和健康依赖。在本研究中，我们评估了性别、性别角色和性别角色刻板印象评分与RPT分量表得分之间的关系。在研究1中，我们重复了RPT得分中早期的性别差异模式，评估了性别差异效应大小的跨样本一致性，并为RPT分量表提供了初步的非临床常模。研究2表明——正如预期的那样——DO项目被视为典型的女性化项目，而DD项目被视为典型的男性化项目。在研究3中，我们研究了RPT分量表得分与男性气质、女性气质和双性化得分之间的关系。我们讨论了这些发现的理论、实证和临床意义。
