Suppr超能文献

关系剖面图测试的结构效度:性别、性别角色和性别角色刻板印象的影响。

Construct validity of the relationship profile test: impact of gender, gender role, and gender role stereotype.

作者信息

Bornstein Robert F, Geiselman Kimberly J, Gallagher Heather A, Ng H Mei, Hughes Erin E, Languirand Mary A

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Gettysburg College, PA 17325, USA.

出版信息

J Pers Assess. 2004 Feb;82(1):104-13. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa8201_15.

Abstract

Research supports the construct validity of the Relationship Profile Test (RPT; Bornstein & Languirand, 2003), a 30-item, self-report measure of destructive overdependence (DO), dysfunctional detachment (DD), and healthy dependency. In this investigation, we assessed the relationships of gender, gender role, and gender role stereotype ratings to RPT subscale scores. In Study 1, we replicated earlier patterns of gender differences in RPT scores, assessed cross-sample consistency in gender difference effect sizes, and provided preliminary nonclinical norms for the RPT subscales. Study 2 showed that--as expected--DO items are perceived as stereotypically feminine, whereas DD items are perceived as stereotypically masculine. In Study 3, we examined the relationships of RPT subscale scores to masculinity, femininity, and androgyny scores. We discuss the theoretical, empirical, and clinical implications of these findings.

摘要

研究支持关系剖面图测试(RPT;博恩斯坦和朗吉兰德,2003年)的结构效度,这是一项包含30个条目的自我报告测量工具,用于测量破坏性过度依赖(DO)、功能失调性疏离(DD)和健康依赖。在本研究中,我们评估了性别、性别角色和性别角色刻板印象评分与RPT分量表得分之间的关系。在研究1中,我们重复了RPT得分中早期的性别差异模式,评估了性别差异效应大小的跨样本一致性,并为RPT分量表提供了初步的非临床常模。研究2表明——正如预期的那样——DO项目被视为典型的女性化项目,而DD项目被视为典型的男性化项目。在研究3中,我们研究了RPT分量表得分与男性气质、女性气质和双性化得分之间的关系。我们讨论了这些发现的理论、实证和临床意义。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验