Whited John D, Datta Santanu, Hall Russell P, Foy Marjorie E, Marbrey Laurie E, Grambow Steven C, Dudley Tara K, Simel David L, Oddone Eugene Z
Institute for Clinical and Epidemiologic Research, VA Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Telemed J E Health. 2003 Winter;9(4):351-60. doi: 10.1089/153056203772744671.
Our objective was to assess the economic impact of store-and-forward teledermatology in a United States Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) health care setting. Patients being referred to the Dermatology Consult Service from the Primary Care Clinics at the Durham, North Carolina VA Medical Center were randomized either to usual care or to a teledermatology consultation. Fixed and variable costs for both consult modalities were identified using a microcosting approach. The observed clinical outcomes from the randomized trial generated probability and effectiveness measures that were inserted into a decision model. A cost analysis and a cost-effectiveness analysis that compared the two consult modalities was performed. Teledermatology was not cost saving when compared to usual care using observed costs and outcomes. Sensitivity analyses indicated that teledermatology has the potential to be cost saving if clinic visit costs, travel costs, or averted clinic visits were higher than observed in the study. Teledermatology was cost-effective for decreasing the time required for patients to reach a point of initial definitive care. Cost-effectiveness ratios ranged from $0.12-0.17 (U.S.) per patient per day of time to initial intervention.
我们的目标是评估存储转发式远程皮肤病学在美国退伍军人事务部(VA)医疗保健环境中的经济影响。从北卡罗来纳州达勒姆VA医疗中心的初级保健诊所转诊至皮肤科咨询服务的患者被随机分为接受常规护理或远程皮肤病学咨询。使用微观成本核算方法确定了两种咨询方式的固定成本和可变成本。随机试验观察到的临床结果产生了概率和有效性指标,并将其纳入决策模型。进行了成本分析和成本效益分析,比较了两种咨询方式。与使用观察到的成本和结果的常规护理相比,远程皮肤病学并没有节省成本。敏感性分析表明,如果门诊就诊成本、交通成本或避免的门诊就诊次数高于研究中观察到的水平,远程皮肤病学有可能节省成本。远程皮肤病学在减少患者达到初始明确治疗点所需时间方面具有成本效益。成本效益比为每位患者每次初始干预时间每天0.12 - 0.17美元(美国)。