Suppr超能文献

在单一城市学术健康系统中前瞻性实施咨询式存储转发远程皮肤病学模型,并进行真实成本数据的亚分析。

Prospective Implementation of a Consultative Store-and-Forward Teledermatology Model at a Single Urban Academic Health System with Real Cost Data Subanalysis.

机构信息

Department of Dermatology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

Penn Medicine Center for Health Care Innovation, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.

出版信息

Telemed J E Health. 2021 Sep;27(9):989-996. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2020.0248. Epub 2020 Nov 4.

Abstract

Teledermatology may increase access to care but has not been widely implemented due, in part, to lack of insurance coverage and reimbursement. We assessed the impact of implementing a consultative store-and-forward teledermatology model on access to care, medical cost, and utilization. Prospective implementation of teledermatology occurred at five University of Pennsylvania Health System primary care practices from June 27, 2016, to May 25, 2017. Primary outcomes included time to case completion, proportion of patients completing in-person dermatology visits, and total outpatient costs. Medical and pharmacy claims data were used for utilization and cost subanalysis. The study included 167 patients and 1,962 controls with a 6-month follow-up. Median time to definitive dermatologist response was 0.19 days (interquartile range [IQR]: 0.03-2.92) for intervention and 83.60 days (IQR: 19.74-159.73) for controls. In medical claims subanalysis, no significant differences in mean outpatient costs ($3,366 vs. $2,232, p = 0.1356) or total medical costs ($3,535 vs. $2,654, p = 0.2899) were detected. Implementation of teledermatology improved access to care, and within this small sample, remained comparable in terms of cost and utilization. Thus, these data suggest teledermatology may improve access without increasing utilization or cost.

摘要

远程皮肤病学可以增加获得医疗服务的机会,但由于缺乏保险覆盖和报销,尚未得到广泛实施。我们评估了实施咨询式存储转发远程皮肤病学模型对获得医疗服务、医疗费用和利用率的影响。从 2016 年 6 月 27 日至 2017 年 5 月 25 日,宾夕法尼亚大学卫生系统的五个初级保健诊所前瞻性地实施了远程皮肤病学。主要结果包括病例完成时间、完成皮肤科就诊的患者比例以及总门诊费用。利用医疗和药房理赔数据进行利用率和成本的亚分析。该研究包括 167 名患者和 1962 名对照患者,随访 6 个月。干预组中,明确皮肤科医生回复的中位数时间为 0.19 天(四分位距[IQR]:0.03-2.92),对照组为 83.60 天(IQR:19.74-159.73)。在医疗理赔亚分析中,门诊费用(3366 美元与 2232 美元,p=0.1356)或总医疗费用(3535 美元与 2654 美元,p=0.2899)的平均值均无显著差异。远程皮肤病学的实施改善了获得医疗服务的机会,而且在这个小样本中,在成本和利用率方面也保持可比。因此,这些数据表明远程皮肤病学可能在不增加利用率或成本的情况下改善获得医疗服务的机会。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

3
Teledermatology in the United States: An Update in a Dynamic Era.美国远程皮肤病学:动态时代的更新。
Telemed J E Health. 2018 Sep;24(9):691-697. doi: 10.1089/tmj.2017.0253. Epub 2018 Jan 22.
4
Global Burden of Skin Disease: Inequities and Innovations.全球皮肤疾病负担:不平等与创新
Curr Dermatol Rep. 2017 Sep;6(3):204-210. doi: 10.1007/s13671-017-0192-7. Epub 2017 Aug 7.
6
A systematic review of satisfaction with teledermatology.电话皮肤病学满意度的系统评价。
J Telemed Telecare. 2018 May;24(4):263-270. doi: 10.1177/1357633X17696587. Epub 2017 Mar 28.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验