Atzpodien J, Kirchner H, Jonas U, Bergmann L, Schott H, Heynemann H, Fornara P, Loening S A, Roigas J, Müller S C, Bodenstein H, Pomer S, Metzner B, Rebmann U, Oberneder R, Siebels M, Wandert T, Puchberger T, Reitz M
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover, Germany.
J Clin Oncol. 2004 Apr 1;22(7):1188-94. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.06.155. Epub 2004 Feb 23.
We conducted a prospectively randomized clinical trial to compare the efficacy of three outpatient therapy regimens in 341 patients with progressive metastatic renal cell carcinoma.
Patients were stratified according to known clinical predictors and were subsequently randomly assigned. Treatment arms were: arm A (n = 132), subcutaneous interferon alfa-2a (sc-IFN-alpha-2a), subcutaneous interleukin-2 (sc-IL-2), and intravenous (IV) fluorouracil; arm B (n = 146): arm A treatment combined with per oral 13-cis-retinoic acid; and arm C (n = 63), sc-IFN-alpha-2a and IV vinblastine.
Treatment (according to the standard 8-week Hannover Atzpodien regimen) arms A, B, and C yielded objective response rates of 31%, 26%, and 20%, respectively. Arm B, but not arm A, showed a significantly improved progression-free survival (PFS) compared with arm C (P =.0248). Both arm A (median overall survival, 25 months; P =.0440) and arm B (median overall survival, 27 months; P =.0227) led to significantly improved overall survival (OS) compared with arm C (median OS, 16 months). All three sc-IFN-alpha-2a-based therapies were moderately or well tolerated.
Our results established the safety and improved long-term therapeutic efficacy of sc-IL-2 plus sc-INF-alpha-2a-based outpatient immunochemotherapies, compared with sc-INF-alpha-2a/IV vinblastine.
我们进行了一项前瞻性随机临床试验,以比较三种门诊治疗方案对341例进展期转移性肾细胞癌患者的疗效。
根据已知的临床预测因素对患者进行分层,随后进行随机分组。治疗组如下:A组(n = 132),皮下注射干扰素α-2a(sc-IFN-α-2a)、皮下注射白细胞介素-2(sc-IL-2)和静脉注射(IV)氟尿嘧啶;B组(n = 146):A组治疗联合口服13-顺式维甲酸;C组(n = 63),sc-IFN-α-2a和静脉注射长春碱。
按照标准的8周汉诺威阿茨波迪恩方案进行治疗,A组、B组和C组的客观缓解率分别为31%、26%和20%。与C组相比,B组(而非A组)的无进展生存期(PFS)显著改善(P = 0.0248)。与C组(中位总生存期,16个月)相比,A组(中位总生存期,25个月;P = 0.0440)和B组(中位总生存期,27个月;P = 0.0227)的总生存期(OS)均显著改善。所有三种基于sc-IFN-α-2a的治疗耐受性均为中度或良好。
我们的结果证实了与sc-INF-α-2a/静脉注射长春碱相比,基于sc-IL-2加sc-INF-α-2a的门诊免疫化疗的安全性及改善的长期治疗疗效。