Ballotta Enzo, Renon Laura, Toffano Michele, Piccoli Antonio, Da Giau Giuseppe
Section of Vascular Surgery, Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences, University of Padua, School of Medicine, Padova, Italy.
J Vasc Surg. 2004 Mar;39(3):539-46. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2003.09.029.
Severe circumferential calcification of the outflow artery during lower-extremity distal revascularization is considered a poor prognostic factor for bypass graft patency. The aim of this study was to assess the influence of circumferential infrapopliteal arterial calcification on bypass graft patency and limb salvage rates, comparing patency and limb salvage rates in unclampable calcified distal outflow arteries with those observed in uncalcified distal outflow arteries.
From July 1990 to July 1997, of 441 distal bypass graft procedures performed by the same surgeon, 69 (16%, group I) involved unclampable calcified outflow vessels, whereas 83 (19%, group II) outflow vessels were uncalcified; the other 289 (65%) had varying intermediate degrees of calcification and were not included in this analysis. All procedures were performed for limb-threatening ischemia and involved standard vein patch angioplasty of the distal anastomotic site, irrespective of the conduit used. Primary and secondary patency, limb salvage, and survival rates were assessed by using Kaplan-Meier analysis.
Groups were similar with regard to age, sex, and atherosclerotic risk factors except for a higher incidence of diabetes mellitus (88% vs 65%, P =.001) and renal failure (17% vs 5%, P =.01), including dialysis dependency (P =.01) in group I. Gangrene as an indication for surgery was statistically more frequent in group I (49% vs 29%, P =.01). The distal anastomotic locations and types of conduit involved were similar in the two groups. The femoral inflow level was used more often in group II (63% vs 38%, P =.003), the popliteal in group I (32% vs 17%, P =.03). Follow-up ranged from 30 days to 144 months, with a mean of 69 months. None of the patients were lost during the follow-up period. None of the patients died during the perioperative (30-day) period. Primary patency rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 84%, 65%, and 52% for group I and 89%, 76%, and 69% for group II (P =.07.). Secondary patency rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 96%, 82%, and 78% for group I and 96%, 85%, and 82% for group II (P =.58). Limb salvage rates at 1, 3, and 5 years were 93%, 83%, and 81% for group I and 97%, 90%, and 86% for group II (P =.39).
Distal revascularization to unclampable, severely calcified outflow arteries can achieve much the same results to those obtained in uncalcified outflow arteries. A circumferentially calcified distal recipient artery should not be considered a major obstacle to an attempt at limb salvage bypass graft surgery.
下肢远端血管重建术中流出道动脉严重的环形钙化被认为是旁路移植通畅性的不良预后因素。本研究的目的是评估腘动脉以下环形动脉钙化对旁路移植通畅率和肢体挽救率的影响,比较不可钳夹的钙化远端流出道动脉与未钙化远端流出道动脉的通畅率和肢体挽救率。
1990年7月至1997年7月,在同一外科医生进行的441例远端旁路移植手术中,69例(16%,I组)涉及不可钳夹的钙化流出道血管,而83例(19%,II组)流出道血管未钙化;另外289例(65%)有不同程度的中间钙化,未纳入本分析。所有手术均针对威胁肢体的缺血进行,且无论使用何种管道,均对远端吻合部位进行标准静脉补片血管成形术。采用Kaplan-Meier分析评估初次和二次通畅率、肢体挽救率和生存率。
两组在年龄、性别和动脉粥样硬化危险因素方面相似,但I组糖尿病(88%对65%,P = 0.001)和肾衰竭(17%对5%,P = 0.01),包括透析依赖(P = 0.01)的发生率较高。I组中作为手术指征的坏疽在统计学上更常见(49%对29%,P = 0.01)。两组的远端吻合位置和所涉及的管道类型相似。II组更常使用股动脉流入水平(63%对38%,P = 0.003),I组更常使用腘动脉(32%对17%,P = 0.03)。随访时间为30天至144个月,平均69个月。随访期间无患者失访。围手术期(30天)无患者死亡。I组1年、3年和5年的初次通畅率分别为84%、65%和52%,II组分别为89%、76%和69%(P = 0.07)。I组1年、3年和5年的二次通畅率分别为96%、82%和78%,II组分别为96%、85%和82%(P = 0.58)。I组1年、3年和5年的肢体挽救率分别为93%、83%和81%,II组分别为97%、90%和86%(P = 0.39)。
对不可钳夹的、严重钙化的流出道动脉进行远端血管重建可取得与未钙化流出道动脉相近的结果。不应将环形钙化的远端受体动脉视为肢体挽救旁路移植手术尝试的主要障碍。