Riley J, Ross J R, Rutter D, Shah S, Gwilliam B, Wells A U, Welsh K
Department of Palliative Medicine, Royal Marsden Hospital, London, UK.
Palliat Med. 2004 Jan;18(1):19-24. doi: 10.1191/0269216304pm856oa.
Morphine is the strong opioid of choice for the treatment of moderate to severe cancer pain according to guidelines of the World Health Organization (WHO). However, a minority of patients do not receive the desired analgesic effect or suffer intolerable side effects from morphine, and are switched to alternative opioids.
The aim of this retrospective study was to identify factors that might be associated with morphine intolerance. Data were analysed from 100 controls who tolerated morphine and 77 patients who were switched to an alternative opioid. We investigated whether currently logged data could fully explain the need to switch. Demographic details, cancer type (histological diagnosis) and markers related to organ function were included in an analysis of biochemical and haematological parameters.
Patients over 78 years (P = 0.03), or with a high white cell (P = 0.002) or high platelet count (P = 0.003), were more likely to switch. Although our numbers were small, patients with severe organ impairment were more likely to switch. However, a model including white cell count, platelet count, age, serum albumin and alkaline phosphatase, accurately separated switchers and controls in only 68% of cases. There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of the numbers of patients having cytotoxic drugs in the two weeks prior to the haematological and biochemical analysis. Similarly, there were no significant differences in histological diagnoses between groups.
The white cell count was the strongest single effect observed and, as such, warrants further investigation. Further studies are needed in order to accurately define a model that will predict those patients likely to be intolerant of morphine.
根据世界卫生组织(WHO)的指南,吗啡是治疗中度至重度癌症疼痛的首选强效阿片类药物。然而,少数患者未获得理想的镇痛效果或遭受吗啡无法耐受的副作用,从而改用其他阿片类药物。
这项回顾性研究的目的是确定可能与吗啡不耐受相关的因素。分析了100名耐受吗啡的对照者和77名改用其他阿片类药物的患者的数据。我们调查了当前记录的数据是否能充分解释换药的必要性。生化和血液学参数分析中纳入了人口统计学细节、癌症类型(组织学诊断)以及与器官功能相关的标志物。
78岁以上的患者(P = 0.03),或白细胞计数高(P = 0.002)或血小板计数高(P = 0.003)的患者更有可能换药。尽管我们的样本量较小,但严重器官功能损害的患者更有可能换药。然而,一个包含白细胞计数、血小板计数、年龄、血清白蛋白和碱性磷酸酶的模型,仅在68%的病例中准确区分了换药者和对照者。在血液学和生化分析前两周内使用细胞毒性药物的患者数量,两组之间没有显著差异。同样,两组之间的组织学诊断也没有显著差异。
白细胞计数是观察到的最显著的单一影响因素,因此值得进一步研究。需要进一步开展研究以准确确定一个能够预测哪些患者可能对吗啡不耐受的模型。